- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We're not going back to the moon after all"
Collapse
-
Have I got the wrong end of the stick? How is ALICE greener if it is spraying Aluminium Oxide around?
-
Apart from a swig of the old Toilet Duck - theres nowt like Rocket Fuel to get you up and running first thing in the morning. ALICE is interesting not only as being a much 'greener' fuel but also can (potentially) be manufactured on the Moon or Mars - now - if I only had a few billion to invest - theres money to be made here !
NASA and Air Force said today they had successfully launched a 9ft rocket 1,300 feet into the sky powered by aluminum powder and water ice.
Aluminum powder and water ice, or ALICE, has the potential to replace some liquid or solid propellants and is being developed by Purdue University and Pennsylvania State University to possibly replace liquid or solid rocket propellants.
Aside from the environmental impact ALICE could be manufactured in distant places like the moon or Mars, instead of being transported to distant locations at high cost, researchers said.
Researchers said in a paper that aluminum-water combustion has been studied since the 1960s as a viable propellant for propulsion since the mixture's reaction liberates a large amount of energy during combustion as well as green exhaust products. Currently, propellants used for Earth to orbit and orbit-to-orbit missions are expensive. Thus, there is quite a need for new-generation propellants which can be used in the booster stage as well as possess characteristics which make them storable in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). ALICE reportedly has a toothpaste-like consistency, and is cooled to -30° C (-22° F) 24 hours before flight, researchers said.
While not rocket-related, NASA recently opened up the competition for its Green Flight Challenge which offers up to $1.5 million for an aircraft that can average at least 100 mph on a 200-mile flight while achieving greater than 200 passenger miles per gallonLast edited by AlfredJPruffock; 11 September 2009, 08:15.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou find a way to fully convert mass to energy, and it's less of a limiting factor than you'd think. The Nagasaki bomb converted about 1 gram of mass to energy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou find a way to fully convert mass to energy, and it's less of a limiting factor than you'd think. The Nagasaki bomb converted about 1 gram of mass to energy.
So you'd only need something like a thirtieth of a gram to get a Space Shuttle into orbit.
Assuming you had dilithium crystals as the controlling catalyst of course, otherwise it would all go off at once.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostUnfortunately we already know the maximum energy density possible (per weight), and that's MC^2. Fancy sounding compounds or crystals won't ever get around that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostMars should be left alone for some time to come. There is plenty to be done by using robots, etc. Keep Earth life off the place and continue to study. It'll still be there later.
Leave a comment:
-
Mars should be left alone for some time to come. There is plenty to be done by using robots, etc. Keep Earth life off the place and continue to study. It'll still be there later.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostCome on, get on with it, or I'll never get off this rainy cold rock...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostCome one, hu-mans, get on with it.
I've got a shedload of di-lithium available at very reasonable rates.
There's never a warp engineer around when you need one...
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think we will get anyone on Mars in our lifetime's either. We should concentrate on getting the Moon colonised, and leave Mars for probes and robots. In the meantime, we could declare war on the Moon which would advance space technology no end.
Leave a comment:
-
We're not going back to the moon after all
We may see China or India attempt a moon landing. Hate to say this guys and gals, but you aren't going to see anyone go to Mars in your lifetime. It's not technology holding us back (or even finance) but the human body. It just can't cope with that amount of time in Space - although they keep experimenting with long stays in the space station.
We need someone to invent a warp drive!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostAh, slightly too early for me.
Earliest programme like that i can remember watching was Terrahawks
and **** me was that scary when I was 5
I would recomend at least looking at a few episodes on youtube if you like that sort of thing.
Also check out the title track by May and friends (just look at the line up of who is on it).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjijteu0gcQ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostEarly 80's (82 I think). I was at college and it was good Saturday morning telly. Brian May recorded a cracking solo album based on the title track.
Earliest programme like that i can remember watching was Terrahawks
and **** me was that scary when I was 5
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostWhen was that aired in the UK? I don't recognise it at all
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: