• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "oh dear: NHS chaos exposed by new e-mails"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Hmmm. Perhaps just "oblivious" then.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    Why bother sabotaging a public sector project..? They are doomed from the beginning... as soon as a big consultancy gets involved (and then ironically starts trying to recruit expertise from the contracting world, having done their worst to to destroy us), the consultancy goes into 'damage limitation mode' which means - get the money, sue if we dont get paid, and then pay off those in a position to award future contracts.

    About the only thing that keeps consultancies alive is that they know that the people who are responsible for overseeing public contracts come and go.... so they can use all sorts of american-style selling tactics to people who arent aware of their long history of failure.....


    P.S and to correct an earlier point, not all of the current NHS projects requires security clearance... I was working on the At Risk Register with CHI and SKI and ive never been cleared for such access.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek
    It will feature numerous officials with meaningless job titles, being paid obscene amounts of money for what is effectively willful espionage on their own systems.
    Excellent idea BGG.

    BTW, did you mean "willful sabotage"? I'm not sure the humour in "willful espionage" is easy to get across.

    And did you mean "willful"? In the picture you have painted, "oblivious" might do better. As in "oblivious to the fact they are sabotaging their own systems." Or perhaps just "oblivious to their own systems."
    Last edited by wendigo100; 14 November 2005, 23:24.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    Anyone remeber a series years ago called the Gravy Train about the EU...?

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Thank you folks !

    You know, working in the public sector has really opened my eyes.

    I mean, before I worked in this sector, I had heard all the jokes and hushed whispers....but nothing prepared me for what I now see on a daily basis.

    When writing my analogy, I though to myself, "No one's going to believe this....it's just too incredible, it's beggar's belief", but I can see that several others have also been subjected to the same public sector woes that I now experience.

    I have enough material now to write a new type of comedy....the Public Sector Farce.

    It will feature numerous officials with meaningless job titles, being paid obscene amounts of money for what is effectively willful espionage on their own systems.

    Essentially, each episode will revolve around a central core idea, the over-arcing story if you like, and will feature mini-stories each episode focussing on bumbling incompetence, empire building, ruthless political in-fighting, hushed whispers of fraud, nepotism and negligence, and all stirred together with a healty dose of black comedy and farce.

    The only problem is...I think "Yes Minister" covered the lot admirably, though it is rather dated now. I'm thinking something more up to date and topical, a mix between The Office, The Consultants (R4 show) and 1984/Brazil.

    :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • wc2
    replied
    BGG,

    You should write for the register

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    if somebody is unhelpful then they will be cut out of the system
    You'll be best advised to avoid civil service contracts my young russian friend...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    BBG - this is all happening because people forgot about responsibility - if that's navigation officer's balls were at stake he'd have to make decision himself and there should be a rule which would basically say - if somebody is unhelpful then they will be cut out of the system.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    BGG: Post of the year award methinks. Really rather good indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied


    *wipes tears from eyes, pulls self together....*

    Are we on the same team BGG???

    That's wot happens when one crowd are paying the bills (and speccing the designs) and the other crowd are using it...

    Granger censures Margaret Edwards, the department’s director for access and patient choice, for adding numerous new specifications to the booking programme, known as Choose and Book.

    Last week Granger, who insists that the booking system now works, broke civil service protocol and publicly blamed policy officials in the Department of Health for failing to get GPs to use the system. In an interview with Computing Magazine, he said: “Low usage is not something I can do anything about.”
    Too many finger's in too many pies....
    Last edited by cojak; 13 November 2005, 19:04.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chico
    replied
    Excellent post - BGG

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    It was me !

    Well, not exactly...you see, the reason I have been quiet these last few months is because I was involved in the grass-roots deployment of the Choose and Book system.

    I suppose I'd better not say anymore due to my NDA. I've finished C&B now, and have moved on to another project.

    However, like any big project, it has it's fair share of challenges.

    Captain of the Ship : "We are sailing to Iceland on Heading 45 Degrees East at 12 knots"

    Navigation Officer : "Aye Aye Cap'n. Iceland it is. Can you confirm the heading ?"

    Captain Designate : "Sorry, the Captain is on holiday. Speak to the Admiralty"

    Navigation Officer : "Hello Admiralty. Can you confirm the heading for Iceland please ?"

    Admiralty : "Which ship are you ?"

    Navigation Officer : "Er...the Endeavour, Sir"

    Admiralty "Ah, we don’t handle your ship. You are in a different fleet run by Accentsore. Call them.”

    Navigation Officer : "Hello Accentsore. This is the Navigation Officer of The Endeavour. I need a heading confirmation for Iceland please."

    Accentsore “ Ah ok. You need to speak to Master Stains. He is the Lead Navigation Officer for our Fleet. But he is on sick leave. Master Bates has taken over his role temporarily. Speak to him.”

    Navigation Officer : "Hello Master Bates. I need a heading confirmation please.”

    Master Bates : “Hello Navigation Officer. The heading is 25 Degrees SW”

    Navigation Officer : "Ah you sure ? The Captain said it was 45 Degrees East.”

    Master Bates : “I’m fairly certain. Master Stains sent a missive to the Captain, informing him of the change. You can ignore the other two missives.”

    Navigation Officer : "Other two ? ”

    Master Bates : “Yes, one was from the Head Captain Smith, and the other from his pet dog, Fluffy.”

    Navigation Officer : "Who is Head Captain Smith ?”
    Master Bates : “I don’t know. I think he is pretty high up the chain of command. But he left last week to join somebody else.”

    Navigation Officer : "Ah, ok. And Fluffy ?”

    Master Bates : “Fluffy was his dog. He’s still with us. Miniature Daschund. Very odd.”

    Navigation Officer : "Ok, thanks. I’ll let the Engineering Crew know.”

    Master Bates : “Hang on a moment.”

    Navigation Officer : "Why ?”

    Master Bates : “Your Engineering Team are being moved to another Ship tomorrow.”

    Navigation Officer : "Why ?”

    Master Bates : “Some c0ck-up in another area. They need extra resource now.”

    Navigation Officer : "So how do we sail to Iceland then ?

    Master Bates : “Iceland ???!?”

    Navigation Officer : "Well that’s where are heading, isn’t it ?”

    Master Bates : “You didn’t get the missive ?”

    Navigation Officer : "Which missive ?”

    Master Bates : “The one about a change of direction. It was sent 2 weeks ago to the Navigation Officer. Barnes I think the name was”

    Navigation Officer : "I’m Barne’s replacement. I never got to see him before I left. I don’t have access to his email.”

    Master Bates : “Ah…LOL ! That’d be why then ! Oh well, you’re heading to Switzerland now.”

    Navigation Officer : "But….Switzerland is land-locked….how are we supposed to get there ? Hijack Transvestite Elephants and fly in under the cover of darkness ?”

    Master Bates : “I’m not sure. You’ll need to ask the Admiralty.”

    Navigation Officer: “But they don’t cover our vessel. They said so.”

    Master Bates : “Yes, but you are crossing the sea in to their territory. So they will take control from there.”

    Navigation Officer: “Oh. I see. Well thanks for your help. Can I take a direct number if I have any other problems ?”

    Master Bates : “Um…we’re in the middle of an office move, so, er, no. Good Luck. I’m sure it will all work out.”

    Navigation Officer: “Ok thanks.”

    Navigation Officer: “Right Scotty…..I need 12 knots power please.”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Right you are Sir. 12 knots it is. Oh, what’s this about a transfer of crew ?”

    Navigation Officer: “Er…I think we are getting a crew refresh tomorrow”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Why’s that Sir ?”

    Navigation Officer: “Apparently they are short of well-trained crew elsewhere.”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Ok, Sir. It’s just that the Captain said I was staying on, like”

    Navigation Officer: “Really ? He never mentioned to me, Scotty.”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Yes Sir. As part of our new assignement, Sir”

    Navigation Officer: “New assignment ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Yes Sir. We are going in to dock for repairs”

    Navigation Officer: “What ? What repairs ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “We’re having our communication systems upgraded next week, to enable us to communicate more effectively.”

    Navigation Officer: “Why did no one tell me about this ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Because the existing communication system needs upgrading Sir. That’s why no one told you about it. And that’s why it’s being upgraded.”

    Navigation Officer: “Ah. I see. So how long are we in dry dock for ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “I don’t know Sir.”

    Navigation Officer: “Why don’t you know ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “Because the existing communication system broke down completely last week, Sir”

    Navigation Officer: “Why did no one tell me about that ?”

    Head Engineer Scotty : “We tried to Sir, but the system was broken...”

    Etc..etc…etc

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    When I had a "proper" job I always took responsibility to learn about my customer's business, understand it well and produce work that they were happy about even though they never specced it. These guys simply can't be expected to spec things - it should be responsibility of the implementor, most certainly so when implementor is charging billions of pounds -- heck capital punishment should be introduced for those who screw up on such a scale.

    Leave a comment:


  • swamp
    replied
    All the NHS work requires security clearance. Don't think they would be allowed to farm it out to India or use an off the shelf package.

    I worked on two government projects. One was to create a pointless app which didn't have much in the way of a spec. It turned into a bit of a deathmarch, though after much painful effort it eventually went live. Second was for another pointless app which had no spec whatsoever. Looked like turning into another savage deathmarch so I left.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    I had an interview with a company that is selling an alternative to this.... it seems that already there is the possibility to buy an off the shelf system to do pretty much the same thing. As pointed out, many such systems already exist... from airline bookings to car hire etc.

    Even Tescos allows you to book a delivery slot online, make changes to your order, and remembers your 'favourites' for customers across the whole UK. I doubt very much that this aspect of their site cost 20 million...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X