Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: False dawn?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "False dawn?"
Collapse
-
Pretty much all of economics seems to be founded on pillocking around with paper (and electronic) crap that doesn't really exist so what has changed? The people in Iceland are mostly still carrying on as normal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostJ Sainsbury's hiring 20,000 at Xmas.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...hristmas-staff
One job is lost and 10x are created by New Labour.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by George Parr View Post
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...hristmas-staff
One job is lost and 10x are created by New Labour.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI'm not a quant or an economist, but the way I see it the fundamental problems are simple: Government and personal debts are both substantial, and have been getting bigger at an accelerating rate even during times of growth.
Those simple facts were there for all to see a few years ago (and some on CUK have commented on it), but there were so many vested interests that they were largely ignored. The likes of Vince Cable (and, it appears, Menelaus) were shouted down.
To compete with each other in this environment, banks ventured into higher and higher risk lending, and we all know what happened. We are now at the point where people think "saving the banks" has resolved the problems.
However, the current "revival" can only be a blip because the fundamental problems are still there, and they are getting worse.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not a quant or an economist, but the way I see it the fundamental problems are simple: Government and personal debts are both substantial, and have been getting bigger at an accelerating rate even during times of growth.
Those simple facts were there for all to see a few years ago (and some on CUK have commented on it), but there were so many vested interests that they were largely ignored. The likes of Vince Cable (and, it appears, Menelaus) were shouted down.
To compete with each other in this environment, banks ventured into higher and higher risk lending, and we all know what happened. We are now at the point where people think "saving the banks" has resolved the problems.
However, the current "revival" can only be a blip because the fundamental problems are still there, and they are getting worse.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scary View PostPeter Mandelson, the Dark Lord of the Sith gave away our assets to the rich for a song and crushed the remnants of British industry.
Examples include MG Rover, LDV and various building societies - at the expense of the taxpayer, eating into the asset base. It's interesting that they are now cannabalising their existing base (e.g., the service sector and the much vaunted much fawned over financial services industry).
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
The Tories gave away our assets to the rich for a song and crushed the remnants of British industry.
Leave a comment:
-
more because of his timidity and inaction when sitting in No11
The problem is that the confidence was based on a complete lack of understanding.
It always seems that the NL team took the previous successes of the Tories and looked how they could go one further. NL went further by removing any checks and balances the Tories had left in place and completely missed the reasoning for leaving those checks and balances there in the first place.
I am not saying the Tories got it right, some of their policy is responsible for the current mess, but the fiddling at the exchequer has made what would have been costly, ruinous.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostWe were, and we remain as a nation and as an economy buggered. I'm almost less concerned as to where the blame lies - there's plenty to go around and much of it lands squarely on the doorstep of the current resident of No10, not because of his timidity and inaction there - more because of his timidity and inaction when sitting in No11.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostMy Oh My - hindsight is such a wonderful thing - n'est-ce-pas ?
Im sorry for all you Cassandras and Prophets of Doom - The Free Markets proved a lot more robust and a lot more cleverer than you or I could ever imagine - and once again , the abilty of the USA to re-invent itself time and time again ... makes it all so fascinating !
Enjoy the Ride and Viva la Vida !
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: