- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Dead end tools and technologies you wished you hadn't bothered with"
Collapse
-
C++ .... I spent lots of time and effort learning and perfecting it but then investment banking jobs moved to C# and I got put on many "maintenance" roles where all you would learn was a particular end client's API and system with no scope to do something interesting or selling the skills acquired in such an environment, did this for many, many years and regret it now.
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostPartially correct, only the Antenna assembly was in the nose cone proper, the radar body was in the extended part of the forward fuselage. The LRUs did fit around in a circle but I don't recall them being noticeably bigger or smaller at one end than the other and that's from daily handling of said items.
Actually, the different sizes could have included the test equipment, which seemed to comprise more boards than in the aircraft.
PS Haven't heard the term LRU for many years.Last edited by Doggy Styles; 21 June 2012, 06:50.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostBecause the avionic boxes formed a sort of circle around the inside of the nose-cone fuselage, the PCBs in them had to fit into angled bays, i.e. not rectangular, so depending exactly where they went they had some odd angles, mostly just at the top end (away from the connector).
Also, if I recall correctly, because the boxes had to fit inside the nose cone, the boxes were smaller at the front than the back, hence different sized boards.
This was back in the old days, they might have redesigned a lot of it with new DSPs etc since then, which allowed smaller units, which allowed more standard sizes.
Does that sound like gobbledegook?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostCorrect, what's with the odd shaped PCBs?
Also, if I recall correctly, because the boxes had to fit inside the nose cone, the boxes were smaller at the front than the back, hence different sized boards.
This was back in the old days, they might have redesigned a lot of it with new DSPs etc since then, which allowed smaller units, which allowed more standard sizes.
Does that sound like gobbledegook?
Leave a comment:
-
.Net ?
Worked with it for a year, but no experience since, and it's still taking up valuable brain cells I could use for something else
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostWe always just got a fixed price for the job. Publishers tended to offer a choice of fixed price, or no down payment and royalties later; even with decent ones like Ubisoft, putting in months of work on the off chance of an unspecified sum sometime next year made no sense.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostDid you get paid a fixed sum or did you get royalties?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostNow I think about it, I haven't had much call for my 68000 assembly language skills recently
However I always liked the 68000 so I'm glad I bothered with it
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostWorked along side them on the F3 Radar when I was in the mob.
Leave a comment:
-
Now I think about it, I haven't had much call for my 68000 assembly language skills recently
However I always liked the 68000 so I'm glad I bothered with it
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: