• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "disturbing development"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
    Wot a brilliant idea! Wow!

    It only took me 6 minutes to download that video. Far more efficient than Jobserve.

    All I've got to do now is reverse engineer YouTube, write an audio decoder, write a spoken language to text converter then write a text search tool with intelligent homonym & synonym comprehension and voila! I won't need to use the Jobserve search tool any more.

    What a huge improvement, having the agent read out a text ad in video and so add a redundant 2Mb video feed to the original 300 bytes.



    Hmm. I wonder if they could break down the video into 140 character chunks and f**king Twitter it to me?
    And after all that the gist of it was just "send us two references".

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    That's why I've been working from home for the last 2 days. Recording in an office is not the way to do it...

    (and it's much harder than it looks it get it right, btw... )

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Wayne Kerr Recruitment Consultants

    Leave a comment:


  • dinker
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Sorry, I don`t have "passion".

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    That is terrifying camerawork. It feels like he's lying on top of me.
    God - that's awful. It's enough to put you off for life

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    That is terrifying camerawork. It feels like he's lying on top of me.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Wot a brilliant idea! Wow!

    It only took me 6 minutes to download that video. Far more efficient than Jobserve.

    All I've got to do now is reverse engineer YouTube, write an audio decoder, write a spoken language to text converter then write a text search tool with intelligent homonym & synonym comprehension and voila! I won't need to use the Jobserve search tool any more.

    What a huge improvement, having the agent read out a text ad in video and so add a redundant 2Mb video feed to the original 300 bytes.



    Hmm. I wonder if they could break down the video into 140 character chunks and f**king Twitter it to me?

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    Oooh, there's millions of them

    How pathetic. Can we vote them off like x factor?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Here is another example

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-eQrfiMzU0

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Youtube? What's next? Twitter fishing spam?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    I really really hope not
    Me too - Adobe Flash doesn't work in 64-bit Windows 7, and as a Firefox user I can't be bothered to keep switching to 32-bit IE.

    It's a real pain. 64 bit has been going for two or three years now. So what were/are Adobe thinking of?

    Leave a comment:


  • foritisme
    replied
    Could have been worse: youp@rn

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    I really really hope not

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    I can't send the link (gives too much away) but is this a new trend?

    Leave a comment:


  • mace
    replied
    Go on send us the link. Some of the pimpesses are worth looking at.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X