• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Global Warming is start again after this cold spell is over"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Please stop - my ribs are hurting
    What ribs? You'd need a backbone first, and you are obviously deficient one of those.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Another "funny" from the master of wit, Drewster.
    Please stop - my ribs are hurting, you're so hilarious
    Please dont let the emoticon one post please. Pass the account to the clever one. The one who made that post in January 2007.......

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Drewster View Post
    See that Dog Turd over there.....
    The semi-runny one....
    That SMELLs!...

    Thats you that is!!!
    Another "funny" from the master of wit, Drewster.
    Please stop - my ribs are hurting, you're so hilarious

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Your mum smells.
    See that Dog Turd over there.....
    The semi-runny one....
    That SMELLs!...

    Thats you that is!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    QED.
    Please try harder I am bored and want an argument, but not with a 5 year old.
    Your mum smells.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Ah that explains why you talk bollux.

    HTH etc.

    QED.
    Please try harder I am bored and want an argument, but not with a 5 year old.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Or you could just ignore any science of course.
    Ah that explains why you talk bollux.

    HTH etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Or you could just ignore any science of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Every times it rains DP's all over it, how this "proves GW is a myth". His grasp of statistics and facts is on a par with Cyberman's swine flu 'analysis'.
    Ah well he is an unemployed chav from Swindon.
    Albeit with a good imagination.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Every times it rains DP's all over it, how this "proves GW is a myth". His grasp of statistics and facts is on a par with Cyberman's swine flu 'analysis'.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Shouldn't you be rambling about GW in Sas' sandpit thread?
    Can you explain this?

    Over the period from 1979 to 2001, tropospheric trends derived from a widely cited analysis of the Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU) temperature record show little or no warming, while surface temperature trends based on in situ observations show a pronounced warming of ∼0.2 K decade-1. This discrepancy between trends at the surface and in the upper atmosphere has been a source of significant debate. Model predictions of amplification of warming with height in the troposphere are clearly inconsistent with the available observations, leading some researchers to question the adequacy of their representation of the water vapor greenhouse feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    ....
    Shouldn't you be rambling about GW in Sas' sandpit thread?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...37368420070809

    Global warming is forecast to set in with a vengeance after 2009, with at least half of the five following years expected to be hotter than 1998, the warmest year on record, scientists reported on Thursday.

    Climate experts have long predicted a general warming trend over the 21st century spurred by the greenhouse effect, but this new study gets more specific about what is likely to happen in the decade that started in 2005.

    To make this kind of prediction, researchers at Britain's Met Office -- which deals with meteorology -- made a computer model that takes into account such natural phenomena as the El Nino pattern in the Pacific Ocean and other fluctuations in ocean circulation and heat content.





    sasguru, want job in the Public Sector? They need "sharp tools" like you.


    Didn't they also predict that we would have a very hot and dry summer ?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    About time it got hotter. I want my "investment" in air conditioning to pay off.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    That's right you know they predicted this would happen all along.
    Actually it is getting colder due to global warming.
    Or stay the same.

    It might get colder, warmer or stay the same. But either way, we should all pay for it in some way. Gordon!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X