• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Only in the UK!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Only in the UK!"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Alternatively, remove the children from the failing ... parents and place them with middle class folks ...
    This was tried in Oz with the Abos, I understand.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    One of my daughters mates is in this position.
    I read that as "One of my daughters mates in this position"

    I was going to ask how you know what position she mates in

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
    For years I have been advocating a solution to may problems.

    Everyone should be sterilised at birth.

    Once you have passed the relevant social skills and parenting skills exams, you become entitled for the reversal operation.

    But nobody seems to like my solution.


    That was James Wales's idea. Are you him ?

    By the way, I like your idea James.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Mrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
    By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
    The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
    With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.

    How to solve this is a bit of an issue.

    I agree with Mrs Gunman and have been saying it for years, but the PC brigade simply refuse to believe commonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Mrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
    By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
    The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
    With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.

    How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
    My young nephew was going out with a girl who obviously worked this out. After she left school, she got a job in Woolworths. She obviously didn't like that, so she left it after a few days and soon along came an unexpected pregnancy, followed by a council house etc. I doubt if she's planning to work ever again.

    I am lost in admiration: it took her about 4 days to come up with an effective Plan B, I haven't managed it yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    For years I have been advocating a solution to may problems.

    Everyone should be sterilised at birth.

    Once you have passed the relevant social skills and parenting skills exams, you become entitled for the reversal operation.

    But nobody seems to like my solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
    One of my daughters mates is in this position. She was knocked up while at school and now at the age of almost 17 has a little boy. She lives with her mum who herself was a teenage mum. In the street she has cousins aunites and uncles etc The whole place is one inbred chav fest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Menelaus View Post
    True.

    This would place us on the slippery slope towards (potentially) eugenics. That having been said, I think I would support the proposition that only persons of a certain level of educational achievement should be allowed to drop sprogs: in doing so we'd raise the level of intelligence in the country over the course of a couple of hundred years.
    Alternatively, remove the children from the failing single parents and place them with middle class folks who have failed with IVF.

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    MM - I know exactly what you mean. I really don'tt hink people should be "allowed" to have kids if they can't provide for them without the help of the state but when I say it out loud it sounds just like those kind of policies....
    True.

    This would place us on the slippery slope towards (potentially) eugenics. That having been said, I think I would support the proposition that only persons of a certain level of educational achievement should be allowed to drop sprogs: in doing so we'd raise the level of intelligence in the country over the course of a couple of hundred years.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Mrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
    By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
    The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
    With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.

    How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
    I was around when this policy first started to take off. In fact I was bumped down the list due to young single mums.
    The debate in those days centred around the nightmare of young mums bringing up a baby in a cramped bedroom that was shared with three other sisters.
    There was a lot of sympathy for that point of view although I guess the pendulum has swung the other way


    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    It's a bit hard to comment on without sounding like I advocate 3rd Reich or Maoist policies.
    MM - I know exactly what you mean. I really don'tt hink people should be "allowed" to have kids if they can't provide for them without the help of the state but when I say it out loud it sounds just like those kind of policies....

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
    It's a bit hard to comment on without sounding like I advocate 3rd Reich or Maoist policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Mrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
    By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
    The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
    With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.

    How to solve this is a bit of an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    "Young people were especially positive about the activities on offer and their relationships with staff."
    __________________________________________________ ___
    So while it was 6m wasted they got on well with the staff. More non job bollocks in the uk
    It was probably the staff who helped increase the number of pregnancies...

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    There's a simple way to solve most of this countries education problems:


    STOP DICKING AROUND WITH EVERYTHING EVERY TWO MINUTES

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X