Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Only in the UK!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Only in the UK!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostFor years I have been advocating a solution to may problems.
Everyone should be sterilised at birth.
Once you have passed the relevant social skills and parenting skills exams, you become entitled for the reversal operation.
But nobody seems to like my solution.
That was James Wales's idea. Are you him ?
By the way, I like your idea James.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostMrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
I agree with Mrs Gunman and have been saying it for years, but the PC brigade simply refuse to believe commonsense.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostMrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
I am lost in admiration: it took her about 4 days to come up with an effective Plan B, I haven't managed it yet.
Leave a comment:
-
For years I have been advocating a solution to may problems.
Everyone should be sterilised at birth.
Once you have passed the relevant social skills and parenting skills exams, you become entitled for the reversal operation.
But nobody seems to like my solution.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostWith some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostTrue.
This would place us on the slippery slope towards (potentially) eugenics. That having been said, I think I would support the proposition that only persons of a certain level of educational achievement should be allowed to drop sprogs: in doing so we'd raise the level of intelligence in the country over the course of a couple of hundred years.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cailin maith View PostMM - I know exactly what you mean. I really don'tt hink people should be "allowed" to have kids if they can't provide for them without the help of the state but when I say it out loud it sounds just like those kind of policies....
This would place us on the slippery slope towards (potentially) eugenics. That having been said, I think I would support the proposition that only persons of a certain level of educational achievement should be allowed to drop sprogs: in doing so we'd raise the level of intelligence in the country over the course of a couple of hundred years.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostMrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
The debate in those days centred around the nightmare of young mums bringing up a baby in a cramped bedroom that was shared with three other sisters.
There was a lot of sympathy for that point of view although I guess the pendulum has swung the other way
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostIt's a bit hard to comment on without sounding like I advocate 3rd Reich or Maoist policies.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostHow to solve this is a bit of an issue.
Leave a comment:
-
Mrs Gunman works in this area. Not this particular scheme, but with disafected people in general.
By far the biggest cause of teen pregnancies she sees is due to the fact that these girls can jump the council house queue. Single mums are a priority.
The high risk group are at the lower end of the social and educational scale. They have few prospects other than a life on the dole. Many have multiple sprogs because that gets them off the council estates as the council houses on the estates are often 2 or 3 roomers.
With some it is almost a family franchise with 2 or 3 generations and siblings all on the same street or estate.
How to solve this is a bit of an issue.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post"Young people were especially positive about the activities on offer and their relationships with staff."
__________________________________________________ ___
So while it was 6m wasted they got on well with the staff. More non job bollocks in the uk
Leave a comment:
-
There's a simple way to solve most of this countries education problems:
STOP DICKING AROUND WITH EVERYTHING EVERY TWO MINUTES
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How much tax to pay HMRC on cryptocurrency? Yesterday 10:00
- Life Insurance services Jan 15 10:21
- Relevant Life Insurance Services Jan 15 10:08
- Will umbrella company regulation spark mergers and acquisitions? Jan 15 09:24
- Critical Illness Insurance for Contractors: Protect Yourself When It Matters Most Jan 14 16:26
- Relevant Life Insurance for Contractors with a Limited Company Jan 14 16:14
- Life Insurance for Contractors: Why it’s Essential Jan 14 16:09
- Guide to Income Protection Insurance for Contractors Jan 14 16:00
- Treasury minister told six actions can save contractor umbrella sector from ‘existential’ crisis Jan 14 09:40
- Critical Illness Services Jan 13 16:41
Leave a comment: