39 ? and the rest ...
Just don't get married in the first place. Simples
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: It's about time
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It's about time"
Collapse
-
I see this as possibly a can of worms.
Pre nups should not hold in the UK unless the marriage contract is changed.
Other laws are based on a married couple being treated as one (I know there are exceptions) and this will have a knock on to those.
This could get complicated.
Do we think the legal statement that "a contract is a contract" sets any kind of precedent for IR35 cases? After all we have contracts.
Leave a comment:
-
Can't have it both ways
Take the future earnings of your spouse take future losses. If they make pre nups legal then many people will lose out.
Leave a comment:
-
Ummmmm when did I do that, I can't remember that, I didn't mean to offend I am so not Right Wing, humourless granted I see your point.Originally posted by Drewster View PostLets see.......
CyberDud: Humourless, Slightly Right Wing, A bit UHS, someone tedious, can be offensive, tends to ignore any other viewpoint but his own.........
BackStreetWalker:...............
OK I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time.....
PS I am still upset that you called me SAS
Come on give BB a hug

PS: BackStreetWalker I am going to change my name Brilliant
Leave a comment:
-
Lets see.......Originally posted by BlackenedBiker View Post
Or I am taking the proverbial....you decide

CyberDud: Humourless, Slightly Right Wing, A bit UHS, someone tedious, can be offensive, tends to ignore any other viewpoint but his own.........
BackStreetWalker:...............
OK I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time.....
PS I am still upset that you called me SAS
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Drewster View PostYou are CyberDuds sockpupet AICM£5
Or I am taking the proverbial....you decide
Leave a comment:
-
Stop I am sporting a semiOriginally posted by thunderlizard View PostBut she knows how to hang on to her cash, as well as dressing like Thatcher in opposition. Run away!
Leave a comment:
-
But she knows how to hang on to her cash, as well as dressing like Thatcher in opposition. Run away!
Leave a comment:
-
So she's an unmarried rich German woman, better find out where she lives/drinks/parties/etc. and get down there quick
Leave a comment:
-
It's about time
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: