Reply to: Moron Farm - Episode 1

[Drewster]

I suspect most of you too often take sas more seriously than he takes himself.

I do belive you have a valid point there...........

Amongst all the banter/narcissm/insults etc are invariably arguments/opinion/debate that I found myself agreeing with almost without exception.

But not there..........

NB
Technically you might be correct - in that you might agree with him (its just that I don't)

[snaw]

Sas, just calm down will you ?

I read the thread about the muslims and Cybertory and Rosbif and noticed that you appeared to be involved in some sort of argument with them.

Now you start your own thread in which you continue your abuse.

Not content with disagreeing with them on one thread, you feel it justifiable to start another with the explicit intention of aggravating them even more ?

I think this speaks volumes in and of itself.

CUK : Where abuse is just a post away....

Umm. It's a bit of a CUK tradition, and it's pretty ****gin funny. IMO.

Was worthy of a side thread,.

[d000hg]

I suspect most of you too often take sas more seriously than he takes himself. Amongst all the banter/narcissm/insults etc are invariably arguments/opinion/debate that I found myself agreeing with almost without exception.

But what's the point? I'm not complaining (for now) that he engages in insulting other members and so on - he's certainly no worse than DP et al in that respect - only about the specific fact he posts new threads to continue old arguments. Apart from anything else, it just makes real threads harder to spot.

[cailin maith]

I suspect most of you too often take sas more seriously than he takes himself. Amongst all the banter/narcissm/insults etc are invariably arguments/opinion/debate that I found myself agreeing with almost without exception.

Agreed.

[Pinto]

Indeed, SAS tries hard to elevate his persona above the rest of us and claims to be the analytic thinker on economics etc. But on the flip-side he regularly takes part in what most forums would consider one of the worst offences, starting a thread purely to insult another member.

I think he reckons not enough people see his witty put-downs and scintillating
counter-arguments unless he brightens their day by posting a link.

There are 3 sasgurus though, so we're led to believe. Maybe you're describing 2 of them, leaving one sound one, if we assume that within the potential 2 you describe there lies the simple one with the emoticons

[Churchill]

I suspect most of you too often take sas more seriously than he takes himself. Amongst all the banter/narcissm/insults etc are invariably arguments/opinion/debate that I found myself agreeing with almost without exception.

Fools seldom differ.

[oracleslave]

Indeed, SAS tries hard to elevate his persona above the rest of us and claims to be the analytic thinker on economics etc. But on the flip-side he regularly takes part in what most forums would consider one of the worst offences, starting a thread purely to insult another member.

I think he reckons not enough people see his witty put-downs and scintillating
counter-arguments unless he brightens their day by posting a link.

I suspect most of you too often take sas more seriously than he takes himself. Amongst all the banter/narcissm/insults etc are invariably arguments/opinion/debate that I found myself agreeing with almost without exception.

[d000hg]

Sas, just calm down will you ?

I read the thread about the muslims and Cybertory and Rosbif and noticed that you appeared to be involved in some sort of argument with them.

Now you start your own thread in which you continue your abuse.

Not content with disagreeing with them on one thread, you feel it justifiable to start another with the explicit intention of aggravating them even more ?

I think this speaks volumes in and of itself.

CUK : Where abuse is just a post away....

Indeed, SAS tries hard to elevate his persona above the rest of us and claims to be the analytic thinker on economics etc. But on the flip-side he regularly takes part in what most forums would consider one of the worst offences, starting a thread purely to insult another member.

I think he reckons not enough people see his witty put-downs and scintillating
counter-arguments unless he brightens their day by posting a link.

[BrilloPad]

CUK : Where abuse is just a post away....

WHS

[oracleslave]

sas is an angry little man with a superiority complex and an Aygo.

Typical small person behaviour. He probably looks like a small terrier.

[DimPrawn]

sas is an angry little man with a superiority complex and an Aygo.

Typical small person behaviour. He probably looks like a small terrier.

[Board Game Geek]

Sas, just calm down will you ?

I read the thread about the muslims and Cybertory and Rosbif and noticed that you appeared to be involved in some sort of argument with them.

Now you start your own thread in which you continue your abuse.

Not content with disagreeing with them on one thread, you feel it justifiable to start another with the explicit intention of aggravating them even more ?

I think this speaks volumes in and of itself.

CUK : Where abuse is just a post away....

[snaw]

No apparently 13% of the snails with funny shells suddenly started breeding like crazy.

Bugger you're right.

Before you know it they're all crawling around with little veils and suspicious shells on their backs ...

[sasguru]

Sasguru moved in with them.

Only in my role as counsellor for special needs.

[sasguru]

13% of the snails moved out on religious grounds.

No apparently 13% of the snails with funny shells suddenly started breeding like crazy.