Reply to: #IranElection

[Old Greg]

Lets just keep Andyw - if we forget about the other numpty - he might eventually go away!

Yeah, Andyw was class in comparison.

[cailin maith]

Perhaps he should replace Andyw as default on the polls?

Lets just keep Andyw - if we forget about the other numpty - he might eventually go away!

[sasguru]

I did, did I?

You're just wrong, wrong, wrong all the time.

Was there ever a more simple-minded poster on CUK?

I genuinely don't believe so.

Perhaps he should replace Andyw as default on the polls?

[oracleslave]

I did, did I?

You're just wrong, wrong, wrong all the time.

Was there ever a more simple-minded poster on CUK?

I genuinely don't believe so.

CyberTwat should be left in the corner and watered twice a week. His intellectual poverty is here to be mocked. Enjoy!

[snaw]

It seems you've lost this argument then. From saying that we should take action you are now saying that we shouldn't. Easily swayed eh !!

I did, did I?

You're just wrong, wrong, wrong all the time.

Was there ever a more simple-minded poster on CUK?

I genuinely don't believe so.

[FSM with Cheddar]

What's your point?


Equally I'm pretty worried about a country that's developing nuclear weapons (Looks that way anyway) that has a leader who's stated he wants to wipe Israel of the face of the earth. To think this somehow doesn't concern us, is ni my opinion very naive.

That is not what he said. He said "[he wanted to] remove Zionism from the pages of history"

It is a difficult translation from iranian to English, and the translator for the BBC got it wrong during the live broadcast, but corrected it later.

I'm not defending him, he is a nutter (denies the holocaust etc), however you need to remember there are a lot of jews that live in Iran and get on fine with everyone. If I lived in Iran, I would be worried about a nuclear neighbour that thinks it has a god given right to land.

[Cyberman]

What's your point?



No offence taken, but care to point out I stated that's my theory?

You stated we, in this country shouldn't be interested, I pointed out that it's a country with large reserves of oil and is trying to develop nuclear technology, presumably to develop nuclear weapons.

On the oil front, any instability in that country affects oil prices which directly affect us as a country and you and me as individuals. So yes, of course we should be interested.

Equally I'm pretty worried about a country that's developing nuclear weapons (Looks that way anyway) that has a leader who's stated he wants to wipe Israel of the face of the earth. To think this somehow doesn't concern us, is ni my opinion very naive.

At no point did I suggest we invade them, not quite sure what kind of crack you were smoking to get that interpretation - if I'm honest I think we invaded the wrong country when we went into Iraq, but I definitely don't think doing the same thing again is going to lead to a better outcome.

It seems you've lost this argument then. From saying that we should take action you are now saying that we shouldn't. Easily swayed eh !!

[cojak]

Was Twitter shut down for maintenance in the end?

[snaw]

Iraq was also a major oil producer and apparently had some "Weapons of Mass Destruction"..at least thats what we'v been told. And look what we have achieved so far.

What's your point?

As per your theory, any country which has some natural resources and strong weapon systems are eligible to be intervened by United States of Anglo America.

No offence, but its not good for this country.

No offence taken, but care to point out I stated that's my theory?

You stated we, in this country shouldn't be interested, I pointed out that it's a country with large reserves of oil and is trying to develop nuclear technology, presumably to develop nuclear weapons.

On the oil front, any instability in that country affects oil prices which directly affect us as a country and you and me as individuals. So yes, of course we should be interested.

Equally I'm pretty worried about a country that's developing nuclear weapons (Looks that way anyway) that has a leader who's stated he wants to wipe Israel of the face of the earth. To think this somehow doesn't concern us, is ni my opinion very naive.

At no point did I suggest we invade them, not quite sure what kind of crack you were smoking to get that interpretation - if I'm honest I think we invaded the wrong country when we went into Iraq, but I definitely don't think doing the same thing again is going to lead to a better outcome.

[Pickle2]

develop efficient nuclear resistance system(just in case) .

A giant car-crash airbag that inflates over london, bouncing the missile off somewhere in france?

Gets my tax dollar.

[denver2k]

Indeed, political events in a major oil producing country, that's seeking to develop nuclear weapons has got nothing to do with us.

Little bit naive, no?

Iraq was also a major oil producer and apparently had some "Weapons of Mass Destruction"..at least thats what we'v been told. And look what we have achieved so far.

As per your theory, any country which has some natural resources and strong weapon systems are eligible to be intervened by United States of Anglo America.

No offence, but its not good for this country.

Instead of considering them as colonies and worrying about their control on oil resources and nuclear power, Britain should rather use their efforts in developing sustainable and green energy alternatives (i.e. reduce dependency on oil producers),develop efficient nuclear resistance system(just in case) and have healthy and friendly relationship with rest of the (Non Muslim and Muslim)world.

[snaw]

Far more than you, that's for sure. We should learn from past mistakes, not repeat them. That's why people such as you keep returning Labour to power to continually return us to poverty status.

You're far more incapable of coherent thought than me? At last we agree on something!

And for the record, wrong again on both counts. I would try to explain, but what's the point of trying to hold a conversation with someone as imbecilic as you? You're a one trick pony who's only trick is a never ending stream of complete and utter tulipe on every post made.

[Old Greg]

Far more than you, that's for sure. We should learn from past mistakes, not repeat them. That's why people such as you keep returning Labour to power to continually return us to poverty status.

Glad we're all in agreement. You are indeed far more incapable of coherent thought than snaw, that's for sure.

[Cyberman]

You really are incapable of coherent thought, aren't you?

Far more than you, that's for sure. We should learn from past mistakes, not repeat them. That's why people such as you keep returning Labour to power to continually return us to poverty status.

[snaw]

It is none of our business. Muslims already hate us for intervening in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't think we should be adding more fuel to the flames. Let them sort themselves out and destroy eachother if they wish.

You really are incapable of coherent thought, aren't you?