• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Apprentice Winner!"

Collapse

  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Can you blame him?
    Not at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Does ringing an agent begging for work constitute "marketing" ?
    yep.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Menelaus View Post
    At least with us we not only "market" ourselves
    Does ringing an agent begging for work constitute "marketing" ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Absolutely. But their businesses are mostly different to us, it's mass-market. Style (marketing, packaging and selling) is key or no-one buys the stuff. Everyone appreciated that the product flaws could be sorted out given time.
    A good point, but even brands where businesses have spent close to sod-all on marketing still manage to make money and have the consumers queuing out the door (EasyJet, for example)

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Menelaus View Post
    True, but again, this is style over substance.

    At least with us we not only "market" ourselves, we also provide the services. We are, in short, the SME engine underpinning the economy!
    Absolutely. But their businesses are mostly different to us, it's mass-market. Style (marketing, packaging and selling) is key or no-one buys the stuff. Everyone appreciated that the product flaws could be sorted out given time.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    Yes, no doubt about it. Would you hire a "finance director" who didn't know company accounts were public documents? Suralan saw no further than what was up her dress.
    Can you blame him?

    At least she got her accounts in on time, even if she never had a clue what was in them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Originally posted by Drewster View Post
    Are you seriously suggesting that Sir Alan Sugar was influenced by a nice pair of puppies....

    Do you really think that he employed a young lady who doesn't know what "turnover" is, doesn't know what her "profit" was - although claiming to be the Finance Director of her Restaurant/Company because she has nice baps??

    Well it could be worse - he could have Hired Kate....... although she might also have a couple of good points her other skills seemed to stop at "Looking Good"........
    Yes, no doubt about it. Would you hire a "finance director" who didn't know company accounts were public documents? Suralan saw no further than what was up her dress.

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post


    Perhaps you are missing the point though.

    I don't think knocking together a software system, building a network, or changing tapes for a couple of days would make very good TV, or demonstrate much entreprenuerial spirit. Furthermore, that's not the type of person that this program is trying to unearth.

    At the end of the day, the two finalists were praised by all those present from the confection industry, for (in their words) getting good marketing campaigns off the ground in three days that would take their own people months. Especially considering that the finalists knew nothing about the industry or the task beforehand.

    I hate defending Suralan but I have to on this occasion.
    True, but again, this is style over substance.

    At least with us we not only "market" ourselves, we also provide the services. We are, in short, the SME engine underpinning the economy!

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    You're missing the point. We, who are accustomed to doing something at least vaguely useful, would not want to waste our lives on those tasks. Those tasks should not be done.


    Perhaps you are missing the point though.

    I don't think knocking together a software system, building a network, or changing tapes for a couple of days would make very good TV, or demonstrate much entreprenuerial spirit. Furthermore, that's not the type of person that this program is trying to unearth.

    At the end of the day, the two finalists were praised by all those present from the confection industry, for (in their words) getting good marketing campaigns off the ground in three days that would take their own people months. Especially considering that the finalists knew nothing about the industry or the task beforehand.

    I hate defending Suralan but I have to on this occasion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    You're missing the point. We, who are accustomed to doing something at least vaguely useful, would not want to waste our lives on those tasks. Those tasks should not be done.
    Well I sort of agree with you.......... except I work in IT.....

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    It's easy to knock them as a bad bunch. But I doubt many on here could do better at those tasks than than the top half of those contestants, within the time constraints.
    You're missing the point. We, who are accustomed to doing something at least vaguely useful, would not want to waste our lives on those tasks. Those tasks should not be done.

    Leave a comment:


  • Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    It's easy to knock them as a bad bunch. But I doubt many on here could do better at those tasks than than the top half of those contestants, within the time constraints.
    I would like to think I could do alot better!

    Ive applied already for the next one!

    I got through in this one but I dont think I was entertainment value to make the final few.

    I just dont think they are interested in people who they know would excel. They are looking for people not very strong in alot of areas but maybe in a few. Also I dont think it helped that last year I put I earned £190k on the form

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    It's easy to knock them as a bad bunch. But I doubt many on here could do better at those tasks than than the top half of those contestants, within the time constraints.
    Possible, but what would our motivation be? We all earn more than the "six-figure" sum suralans' offering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    It's easy to knock them as a bad bunch. But I doubt many on here could do better at those tasks than than the top half of those contestants, within the time constraints.
    any

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Liability View Post
    I think you need to put it into context

    All werent the brightest in the pack - but they each had good skills. This program is about finding people who can be mentored to be successful in Alans company. He aint no fool - and is ruthless as well. But he will invest time and money into them

    Yasmina was probably the best of the bad bunch but Id suspect she will do well.

    Kate was awfull - she would be a good IT Recruitment Consultant to win and get new business or make the first contact - as guys would like to see her face. But put her into a situation which requires brains - and shed collapse.....lol prob like any other rec agent.

    Debra is one that will grow the most form this - as if she learns how to communicate she has alot of potential
    It's easy to knock them as a bad bunch. But I doubt many on here could do better at those tasks than than the top half of those contestants, within the time constraints.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X