• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ripe for the scrapheap?"

Collapse

  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    Wasn't the Morris Minor one of the few cars that was designed to be repaired? Still see a few about today.

    Quite a few products could benefit from a modular design but it goes against the principle of consumerism, everything in modern life is pitched in such a way that the average person needs to keep working in order to keep the economy going, we can’t have people stepping out of line and retiring early can we.
    I'd guess that you see Minors around still because so many of them were made. But it's a good point. The Citroen 2CV was also made to be repaired, by a ham-fisted French farmer with a limited set of tools. The trouble is, it is higher-tech that has given us today's cars with longer life and lower fuel consumption.

    But cars should not need to be replaced often, just for image. The Model T Ford didn't come with built-in obsolescence: a 1909 Model T was pretty much the same as a 1910 Model T, and a 1911 Model T wasn't much changed either (except that it had front doors). It was General Motors that invented the "model year" to persuade people to keep replacing their cars.

    bye GM


    As for consumerism, supporting the economy, and (especially) early retirement/withdrawal from the workforce, I agree too. Right now a big recession and bench time must be impacting on a lot of our plans.....

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post

    Quite a few products could benefit from a modular design but it goes against the principle of consumerism, everything in modern life is pitched in such a way that the average person needs to keep working in order to keep the economy going, we can’t have people stepping out of line and retiring early can we.

    Life's about film stars and less about mothers
    It's all about fast cars and cussing each other
    But it doesn't matter cause I'm packing plastic
    And that's what makes my life so ******* fantastic

    And I am a weapon of massive consumption
    And it's not my fault it's how I'm programmed to function
    I'll look at The Sun and I'll look in The Mirror
    I'm on the right track yeah we're onto a winner

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    We could do with more reusable cars. Engines for example should be based on an extensible engine pattern that inherits from a simple abstract base engine. That way we could keep an old car and just change the engine. Ditto for the other car parts and functions. We could design cars better and faster which would be more reliable and maintainable. In theory.
    Wasn't the Morris Minor one of the few cars that was designed to be repaired? Still see a few about today.

    Quite a few products could benefit from a modular design but it goes against the principle of consumerism, everything in modern life is pitched in such a way that the average person needs to keep working in order to keep the economy going, we can’t have people stepping out of line and retiring early can we.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickNick
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    The majority of the trade-ins has keen at the really low end of the market.

    This is just a way of sending uK taxpayers money to prop-up Korean car manufacturers such as Kia, Hyundai, Perodua, SsangYong and the like.
    Not sure how you got to that. Apart from the fact that Ssang Yong is Chinese and Perodua is Malay, aren't people more likely to trade in these older cheaper cars? The in laws have just traded in a Daewoo for a new Citroen

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    We could do with more reusable cars. Engines for example should be based on an extensible engine pattern that inherits from a simple abstract base engine. That way we could keep an old car and just change the engine. Ditto for the other car parts and functions. We could design cars better and faster which would be more reliable and maintainable. In theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brussels Slumdog
    replied
    I am on the scrap heap

    The family car is ok Its me thats on the scrap heap due to out sourcing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    The catch is that you have to have owned the car for at least 12 months, ie your name on the log book, before you trade it in. It also has to have a currrent MoT.
    I realise that, but if I owned a 10 year old Daewoo and fancied a new one, I'd be a mug to not use the scheme.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The way to get car workers back to the production lines is really quite simple; car manufacturers need to tool up to make stuff people want to buy. FIAT are still doing OK in Europe with the 500 and the Alfa Mito; they’re small and efficient and appeal to women (especially Mrs Tester). GM died because they made too many cars in the US that nobody wanted and in Europe they made too many bland cars that couldn’t bring in a good margin. Again we come back to the most basic principle of business; find out and keep monitoring what people want to buy, and sell it to them.

    Bollux. There's huge overcapacity in the car industry. The large firms were struggling even in the good times (e.g. Ford which makes good cars).
    So some car companies MUST go bust for a healthy industry.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I don't think getting 2-4k off a new car for this 10 year old car I found on Autotrader is that stupid...

    1998 DAEWOO LANOS 1.6 SX 5dr Hatchback
    Price: £220 ono
    Features:
    100,000 milesManualSilverPetrolHatchback1598 cc
    Full Description:
    Glossary of Terms
    5 Door Hatchback, Silver, Petrol, Manual. £220 ono.
    The catch is that you have to have owned the car for at least 12 months, ie your name on the log book, before you trade it in. It also has to have a currrent MoT.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The way to get car workers back to the production lines is really quite simple; car manufacturers need to tool up to make stuff people want to buy. FIAT are still doing OK in Europe with the 500 and the Alfa Mito; they’re small and efficient and appeal to women (especially Mrs Tester). GM died because they made too many cars in the US that nobody wanted and in Europe they made too many bland cars that couldn’t bring in a good margin. Again we come back to the most basic principle of business; find out and keep monitoring what people want to buy, and sell it to them.
    I think you'll find that both Honda and BMW (with the mini) were selling stuff people wanted to buy prior to the crash.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    I think the point of this scheme has been to get car workers back working on the production line (and it's worked locally - both BMW in Cowley and Honda in Swindon have restarted their production lines). Forget any crap about the environment
    The way to get car workers back to the production lines is really quite simple; car manufacturers need to tool up to make stuff people want to buy. FIAT are still doing OK in Europe with the 500 and the Alfa Mito; they’re small and efficient and appeal to women (especially Mrs Tester). GM died because they made too many cars in the US that nobody wanted and in Europe they made too many bland cars that couldn’t bring in a good margin. Again we come back to the most basic principle of business; find out and keep monitoring what people want to buy, and sell it to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    I think the point of this scheme has been to get car workers back working on the production line (and it's worked locally - both BMW in Cowley and Honda in Swindon have restarted their production lines). Forget any crap about the environment
    The majority of the trade-ins has keen at the really low end of the market.

    This is just a way of sending uK taxpayers money to prop-up Korean car manufacturers such as Kia, Hyundai, Perodua, SsangYong and the like.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    My car is 10 years old but worth far more than 2K so the deal does nothing for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    I think the point of this scheme has been to get car workers back working on the production line (and it's worked locally - both BMW in Cowley and Honda in Swindon have restarted their production lines). Forget any crap about the environment

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    It's another backhanded handout to the lower classes.
    People who would always be a couple of grand short of a new car can now trade in the car they can afford and buy a brand new shiney one.

    It will provide a spike in new car sales but will kill the second hand market for years to come.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X