Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "MPs expenses again, FFS they don't get it!"
I'm not defending the other expense claims, however if they need an accountant to deal with the complicated issues of tax, which arise from being an MP. Then this is actually a fair claim.
It isn't, you're breaking the law too if you pay for accountancy service for your personal tax return out of company money.
One difference is that the Commons' "company money" is mine and yours, so we do have a say in its being abused. But that fact that a personal expense is paid with untaxed money, so is therefore a Benefit In Kind, is the same.
Get over it. Who cares. Is this all you've got to worry about? My accountanct changes about £50 to fill in a tax return. Whoopee do.
What's not fair is when the advice given by the accountant is how to flip your house etc.
I dont understand why that is not fair. It's the accountants job to tell you what is possible within the law. How the rules work.
It's up to you whether it is right and proper to follow the advice.
Um, my personal tax return and corp tax are all included in one fee that my accountant charges me.
How is this any different from what the MPs have done?
It isn't, you're breaking the law too if you pay for accountancy service for your personal tax return out of company money.
One difference is that the Commons' "company money" is mine and yours, so we do have a say in its being abused. But that fact that a personal expense is paid with untaxed money, so is therefore a Benefit In Kind, is the same.
Um, my personal tax return and corp tax are all included in one fee that my accountant charges me.
How is this any different from what the MPs have done?
I'm not defending the other expense claims, however if they need an accountant to deal with the complicated issues of tax, which arise from being an MP. Then this is actually a fair claim.
What's not fair is when the advice given by the accountant is how to flip your house etc.
Darling (among others) uses Commons expenses to pay for accountant for personal SA return. Then he justifies it by saying that he did it to ensure that he paid the correct amount of tax.
Yes Alistair, that is indeed why we get an accountant to do our SA return. The problem is that it is a personal expense, but you paid for it with company money. Do you not understand the difference?
Leave a comment: