• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This would be instant dismissal for the rest of us"

Collapse

  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by thelace View Post
    Anyone else fancy an afternoon of letter writing?

    Who'd have thought, CUK could change the world?
    Per Guido Fawkes, the police are there (Parliament) now.

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    A short. polite letter to the chief constable of the force in whose jurisdiction the fraud took place detailing the grounds for the complaint should do the trick. Likewise to the appropriate tax office for HMRC.
    Anyone else fancy an afternoon of letter writing?

    Who'd have thought, CUK could change the world?

    Leave a comment:


  • Central-Scrutiniser
    replied
    The discrediting and ultimate dissolution of the British Politcal Class remains our indispensible objective - the Public must be persuaded to reject the British Political system to embrace its replacement - the superior New World Order Government.
    Last edited by Central-Scrutiniser; 14 May 2009, 12:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by thelace View Post
    At my previous gig, a technical manager was sacked for fiddling £250 on his expenses...

    The police will only investigate if there is a "complaint".

    Is there any etiquet over who can make these complaints? Does it have to be Parliament or can anyone do it?

    I for one would love to, in fact all of us that have an MP who has been named and shamed should consider it our democratic duty to put in a complaint to the police.

    "Come the revolution...." Well that revolution may be already here?



    A complaint has been made.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by thelace View Post
    At my previous gig, a technical manager was sacked for fiddling £250 on his expenses...
    The MOD are incredibly strict. Any expenses fiddle, no matter how small, can result in summary dismissal AND loss of pension.

    But then, they do send you to meetings on a 1st class travel warrant, provide transport to take/collect you from the station etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by thelace View Post
    The police will only investigate if there is a "complaint".


    This is correct, Police will only investigate fraud cases when a complaint is made to bring their attention to it, likewise HMRC unless they turn it up as part of an investigation instigated elsewhere.

    A short. polite letter to the chief constable of the force in whose jurisdiction the fraud took place detailing the grounds for the complaint should do the trick. Likewise to the appropriate tax office for HMRC.

    The police may still bat it away saying that the individual concerned has claimed it was an honest mistake and that there is no way to prove otherwise. HMRC may be a bit more tenacious.

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    At my previous gig, a technical manager was sacked for fiddling £250 on his expenses...

    The police will only investigate if there is a "complaint".

    Is there any etiquet over who can make these complaints? Does it have to be Parliament or can anyone do it?

    I for one would love to, in fact all of us that have an MP who has been named and shamed should consider it our democratic duty to put in a complaint to the police.

    "Come the revolution...." Well that revolution may be already here?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why is he not being prosecuted?
    He'd only be prosecuted for telling the Telegraph.

    HTH - Gorbals Mick

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why is he not being prosecuted?
    Jacqboots only allows opposition MPs to be prosecuted.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Why is he not being prosecuted?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    HMRC should do him for tax evasion
    The Serious Fraud Office should charge him with fraud
    The Labour Party should kick him out

    But I'll bet none of these happen. He'll probably end up as the new speaker, or in the House of Lords.

    The OP is right, Morley was also a worse than useless minister.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    Why not sack him?
    MPs are not employees. They can be chucked out of the party, kicked off the cabinet, but the PM cannot stop them being MPs.


    And that £800 per month or 18 months wasn't a mistake. He was trying it on.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    I would have thought a knock from the fraud squad would have been appropriate.

    Is nobody questioning the comptancy of these individuals to run the country? They can't even manage to do their expenses according to a simple set of rules FFS.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    This was all over the news this morning and they were saying that Brown should remove the whip from this guy and effectively make him an independant. Why not sack him? If anybody in any role was caught fiddling their expenses like this they would be facing serious criminal charges.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    I really don't think anyone can expect to believe that his fraud was a "mistake".

    if it was a mistake then really he doesn't deserve to be running **** all with accounting skills like that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X