I don't like the darn things - they are too dim and when I switch my bedroom light on - nothing happens for about 50s (not that I've timed it of course )
We have one in the bath room which goes every 6 months
pah... grumble... grumble.. etc
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Energy Saver Light Bulbs
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Energy Saver Light Bulbs"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ASB View Post
It did seem to me there was a lot of smoke and mirrors - but we do have to start somewhere.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostThere was an application near me (turned down for a number of reasons) and not being a complete luddite I did a bit of digging. What I discovered was:-
- The provider got paid a huge premium for the electricity
- It could provide power for about 2000 homes
- It could not feed the grid - only the local area (don't know why this was) - and that only had about 800 homes
- The energy used in the production of the 3000 odd tons of concrete to be used in the construction was very close to the total energy predicted to be generated over it's useful life
It did seem to me there was a lot of smoke and mirrors - but we do have to start somewhere.
Wind Power Project
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostThat is correct, one of the myths about wind power is that it is "low carbon". Couldn't be further from the truth. For every 1MW of wind power on the grid, you need 1MW of coal/gas/nuclear back up running and available to cope with falls in wind speed. Some of the transients can be soaked up by pumped storage hydro power, but that also needs fossil/nuclear power to pump the water uphill in the first place. It really, truly is all smoke and mirrors this wind power debacle. Wind power also gives national grid a lot of other problems with network instability.
- The provider got paid a huge premium for the electricity
- It could provide power for about 2000 homes
- It could not feed the grid - only the local area (don't know why this was) - and that only had about 800 homes
- The energy used in the production of the 3000 odd tons of concrete to be used in the construction was very close to the total energy predicted to be generated over it's useful life
It did seem to me there was a lot of smoke and mirrors - but we do have to start somewhere.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostSince we seem to have moved to wind turbines (horrible things) apparently Denmark now produces some 15% of it's electricity needs from wind. However it has been able to switch off none of it's traditional generating because they can't cope with the flows.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostAh yes, the nuclear power station site where planning applications for wind power turbines were rejected on safety grounds.
Since we seem to have moved to wind turbines (horrible things) apparently Denmark now produces some 15% of it's electricity needs from wind. However it has been able to switch off none of it's traditional generating because they can't cope with the flows.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostYou cynical old bugger you. Still we'll be all right. Hinkley 3 is on the way so we probably won't need any bulbs incandescent or otherwise.
Leave a comment:
-
I spoke to the Mother Superior in the local convent last week, as she was positive that the nuns were not going to give up their candles.Last edited by Board Game Geek; 13 May 2009, 08:04.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostThere will be a tax coming along shortly to deal with that issue, just give everyone enough time to make the switch first.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostAre energy efficient bulbs really that much better overall though?
Sure it reduces the power use at the point of consumption (significantly) but what about the rather more substantial energy - and raw resource - use at the point of manufacture?
It would be interesting to know how much better they are overall.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrowneIssue View PostI want to know why you can't get bright energy saving bulbs.
Occasionally I would fit 150W bulbs in the kitchen or home office. There are no such equivalent energy saving bulbs
An 18W energy saver = a 100W proper bulb.
So where is the 25W energy saver?
Or even, the 100W energy saving bulb for that matter? One of those would illuminate my entire loft.
Everything about these energy saving bulbs is crap. Slow to warm up, they flicker they do not seem to last very long, they are fragile and I am sure they are dimmer than their equivalent.
It's all a ruddy great red herring.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheBigD View PostI've tried fitting them to dimmers, and they don't dim at all. When I turn the dimmer swithch down, they make an increasingly loud humming noise, but the brightness isn't reduced.
A dimmer feeds short pulses of power to the bulb - the shorter the pulse, the dimmer the light. With low energy bulbs - the electronics compensate for this and take a higher current for the shorter pulses. Because the power loss in the dimmer and wires are proportional to the square of the current, the components in the dimmer can easily overheat.
Leave a comment:
-
Are energy efficient bulbs really that much better overall though?
Sure it reduces the power use at the point of consumption (significantly) but what about the rather more substantial energy - and raw resource - use at the point of manufacture?
It would be interesting to know how much better they are overall.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrowneIssue View PostI want to know why you can't get bright energy saving bulbs.
Occasionally I would fit 150W bulbs in the kitchen or home office. There are no such equivalent energy saving bulbs
An 18W energy saver = a 100W proper bulb.
So where is the 25W energy saver?
Or even, the 100W energy saving bulb for that matter? One of those would illuminate my entire loft.
Everything about these energy saving bulbs is crap. Slow to warm up, they flicker they do not seem to last very long, they are fragile and I am sure they are dimmer than their equivalent.
It's all a ruddy great red herring.
RE the slow to warm bit - buy a philips turbo - they come on a lot quicker - well at least the OH have stopped complaining.
That reminds me the bathroom light needs changing from the 'slow to warm' type to the turbo. Now, what am I going to do with the old slow to warm bulbs I've got sitting in the cupboard?
Leave a comment:
-
We up the voltage to transmit AC wap it down the grid & then transform it down again to get useful stuff to the consumer .. all of which sap power - so lots of attention being given to HVDC lines - particularly good for offshore stuff
New Scientist
Although DC lost out to AC in the early days of electrification, high-voltage direct current (HVDC) has long had a niche role - transmitting large amounts of power over long distances because it is more efficient than conventional AC lines. Now it is also set to become a key link for the growing number of renewable-energy generators, particularly offshore wind farms. This is leading many in the energy industry to take a fresh look at DC.
Some engineers are thinking big. Their calculations suggest that continent-wide HVDC "supergrids" could help smooth out the variable levels of power created by many far-flung renewable generators to make a fully dependable supply. Supporters say this will eventually mean that coal, gas and nuclear power could be ditched, with renewables replacing them within a couple of decades.
Elements of such a supergrid will soon begin to materialise in Europe, and a proposed €1.2 billion ($1.5 billion) subsidy could help develop these links across the region. Meanwhile, in the US, President Obama's $150 billion energy plan includes a target of 25 per cent renewable electricity by 2025, implying massive investment in high-voltage lines, many of which are likely to be HVDC. At the same time, tests on new superconducting HVDC cables suggest that a grid incorporating this technology could act as a mammoth energy store, helping buffer consumers and utilities against the vagaries of the weather (see "Supercooled grid"). "Whichever way you look at it, there is no doubt that HVDC's time has come," says Graeme Bathurst, technical director of the British-based grid consultancy TNEI.
Edison lost his "battle of the currents" with Nikola Tesla and Westinghouse Electric because at the time AC was a more practical proposition. Put simply, efficient long-distance transmission required high voltages while the public needed safer, lower voltages. That required transformers, which existed for AC networks, but not for DC.
Despite this victory, DC is far more efficient: at the same voltage, it suffers much lower transmission losses than AC. This is because in a DC line the direction of the current is constant, whereas in an AC line it reverses 100 or 120 times a second. This induces small currents in the transmission line insulation, and this energy is then lost as heat. Because of this, HVDC has long enjoyed a niche role transporting large amounts of power efficiently over unusually long distances. One of the earliest big projects was a 600-megawatt link built in 1965 in New Zealand to connect the North and South Islands, which was later upgraded to 1200 megawatts.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: