• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Privacy watchdog snarls at NHS data losses"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Healthcare staff really don't understand the concept of Data Protection. They are past masters at making life as easy as possible regarding computing...
    Must admit in their position I'd be exactly the same. The only solution is "passive" security, such as fingerprint readers and suchlike.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheRefactornator
    replied
    The NHS spine services to enable roll out of electronic transfer of patient records via 3rd party clinical software houses is nearing go live..and other half baked stuff like electronic prescription service which still requires paper FP10s!! not really electronic that is it?? and choose and book, which was previously rolled out and both NHS / patient opinion is that it just doesn't work.

    Leave a comment:


  • the_duderama
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    They were sent as encrypted sound files from the consultant's dictaphones. They had a machine where they just plugged them in and the notes were sent automatically.
    Ahh ok that makes more sense, I've seen a similair system used in law firms, although they would just be sent to a secretary in the same office.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    isn't computing supposed to make life easier and not harder?
    There is always a trade-off between ease of use, cost and security (how many of you out there have the same password to all of your bank accounts?).

    The best compromise/design is to have a 'password' that is with you all the time and you don't have to remember i.e. biometrics (fingerprints or iris scans).

    But all of that is too expensive/advanced for your average NHS Trust.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by the_duderama View Post
    What's the point in typing them up in an email, for the outsourced people to then type them up again? Wouldn't that just result in the hiring of someone to type up the emails for them to be typed up into the system?
    They were sent as encrypted sound files from the consultant's dictaphones. They had a machine where they just plugged them in and the notes were sent automatically.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by the_duderama View Post
    What's the point in typing them up in an email, for the outsourced people to then type them up again? Wouldn't that just result in the hiring of someone to type up the emails for them to be typed up into the system?
    You appear to have spotted the slight flaw in that particular Urban Myth!

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    isn't computing supposed to make life easier and not harder?

    No, its to create jobs for forty year old men with beards who live at home with their mothers

    Leave a comment:


  • the_duderama
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    My wife used to work in a NHS hospital where all the secretarial staff were sacked and the typing was outsourced abroad. All the patient's notes were encrypted and emailed to be typed up remotely then sent back.
    What's the point in typing them up in an email, for the outsourced people to then type them up again? Wouldn't that just result in the hiring of someone to type up the emails for them to be typed up into the system?

    Leave a comment:


  • JamieMoles
    replied
    Originally posted by Menelaus View Post
    If you had an innovative idea that used software that you were familiar with and could code it yourself in your spare time, would you give it to the NHS gratis or would you squeeze the flipers for every last £ you could get?
    If you need to answer that question I would suggest you work out how much money you have paid in NI over the years as this is supposed to go to the NHS to pay for your treatment.

    When you've done that, you should now know how much money you have therefore already given the NHS. You really want to now give them your services free too?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Here's a question. If you had an innovative idea that used software that you were familiar with and could code it yourself in your spare time, would you give it to the NHS gratis or would you squeeze the feckers for every last £ you could get?

    (Note: I'm in a similar position at the moment myself).

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    My wife used to work in a NHS hospital where all the secretarial staff were sacked and the typing was outsourced abroad. All the patient's notes were encrypted and emailed to be typed up remotely then sent back. Of course because of privacy issues, none of the patient's names were sent, the notes were linked to code numbers and then matched back up when the notes came back. Spot the weak link in the chain? How long before someone died because the numbers were matched up incorrectly? Answer; Not very long.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Hospitals should focus on making their patients healthy again quick: that should be their top priority.

    It is far more worrying that in some hospitals some nurses were killing elderly patients and nobody noticed (or cared!). Or that hospital in Staffordshire where lots of people died due to poor conditions - now that's important, al that security malarkley is the result of poor IT design in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Healthcare staff really don't understand the concept of Data Protection. They are past masters at making life as easy as possible regarding computing...
    isn't computing supposed to make life easier and not harder?

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    started a topic Privacy watchdog snarls at NHS data losses

    Privacy watchdog snarls at NHS data losses

    Again

    Hospitals are absolutely abysmal when it comes to data security. They used to throw records into unsupervised taxis between them before before the digital age and complained bitterly then security was added during NPfIT rollout.

    Consultants and nurses were as bad as each other. Consultants used to hand their passwords to any passing PA as they often didn't deign to touch a computer unless it was 'sexy' (digital x-rays), and nurses used have a communal security card that was always lying around the desk. I might have wept when I saw what was going on.

    Healthcare staff really don't understand the concept of Data Protection. They are past masters at making life as easy as possible regarding computing...

Working...
X