Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
That just has to be basic physics, opposite poles attract and like poles repel each other. That's what's causing the 'motor' to spin in a constant orbit. His slight hand movements are what's shifting its axis.
The reason why it's not practical is because as someone said once you add a generator to the equation you're going to create friction which means far more powerful magnets. There's no way you could run a power station with something like that.
Although is that not just what CERN is, a great big electromagnet used for propulsion? Wasn't cheap either was it.
**Sorry, not CERN, I meant the Large Hadron Collider. CERN is the agency
He also needs to add a rod to the "motor" to get it to generate the electricity which will generate friction, which will (in all likelyhood) stop the magnet from spinning...
I dunno - maybe it's me I got bored after about a minute..but that fella does remind of the guy off the vee-dubble-yer advert. He's only missing the dungarees.
Leave a comment: