• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: More AGW madness

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More AGW madness"

Collapse

  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by landl View Post
    ...removing catalytic converters from all 4x4s is the answer to solving the Earth's climate issues? Honestly, those bl00dy tree hugging environmentalists have destroyed this planet in the last twenty years. Must do my bit for the planet tonight and rev my engine extra hard at the lights.
    Well, catalytic converters are a pretty dumb idea if you want to 'save the planet'.

    1) The way they work cause a vehicle to burn more fossil fuels than if they weren't there.
    2) The mining of the rare earth metals needed for the catalyst is an environmental catastrophe.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Wouldn't it be easier to detonate a few nuclear bombs a mile or two underground over some supervolcano's magma chamber, to try and stir it into action?

    Yellowstone National Park wouldn't be a good choice, because if that went up and the wind changed direction then most of the US would be coated in volcanic ash to a depth of several feet.

    But if you waited until the wind was in the right direction, so the ash was blown out to sea, perhaps we could try and wake up Toba.

    P.S. The radioactivity wouldn't be that much of a problem - Volcanic ash is quite radioactive anyway.
    Have you considered a career in government?

    Leave a comment:


  • SantaClaus
    replied
    Originally posted by landl View Post
    ...removing catalytic converters from all 4x4s is the answer to solving the Earth's climate issues? Honestly, those bl00dy tree hugging environmentalists have destroyed this planet in the last twenty years. Must do my bit for the planet tonight and rev my engine extra hard at the lights.
    Removing speed bumps would cut emissions.
    Removing traffic wardens would also remove quite a bit of hot air.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Quicker just to nuke China.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Wouldn't it be easier to detonate a few nuclear bombs a mile or two underground over some supervolcano's magma chamber, to try and stir it into action?

    Yellowstone National Park wouldn't be a good choice, because if that went up and the wind changed direction then most of the US would be coated in volcanic ash to a depth of several feet.

    But if you waited until the wind was in the right direction, so the ash was blown out to sea, perhaps we could try and wake up Toba.

    P.S. The radioactivity wouldn't be that much of a problem - Volcanic ash is quite radioactive anyway.
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 9 April 2009, 17:40.

    Leave a comment:


  • landl
    replied
    So if I understand this correctly....

    ...removing catalytic converters from all 4x4s is the answer to solving the Earth's climate issues? Honestly, those bl00dy tree hugging environmentalists have destroyed this planet in the last twenty years. Must do my bit for the planet tonight and rev my engine extra hard at the lights.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    I thought the whole business of us "shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere" was the very thing the lentil-munching tree-huggers were so sniffy about?
    Jeez I wish they would make their minds up!

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    You're just jealous of the religion thread

    Anyway its good for job creation.
    I'll take that as a no. You are more sensible than the president of the USA's new science advisor. Scary

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Why not have a open fridge day.
    If everyone opens their fridge for one day global temp will be down by 2 degrees.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    You're just jealous of the religion thread

    Anyway its good for job creation.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    started a topic More AGW madness

    More AGW madness

    The president's new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth's air.
    John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.

    "It's got to be looked at," he said. "We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table."


    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

    Madness - direct to you from the office of the president.
    Anyone care to defend this ?
Working...
X