• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This one should warm things up here - not that that is scary"

Collapse

  • ace00
    replied
    I think we can safely say the science is settled on this matter. Cough up & move on.

    In his Fiscal Year 2010 budget, Obama said he planned to raise $646 billion from 2012 to 2019 in climate revenues by auctioning off emission credits in a system that capped greenhouse gas levels and created a market to buy and sell emission allowances. Treasury officials say the actual revenues could actually double or triple that amount.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    But the tundra is not melting! The temperature figures they used to infer the tundra was melting have been shown to be faked.
    Sure, but it's still a laff, innit.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    But the tundra is not melting! The temperature figures they used to infer the tundra was melting have been shown to be faked.
    Shocker.

    So you say that Dyson's argument that climate-alarmists are using bad science because they have already written the conclusion of their "observations" before they have the observations is right.

    It is a shocker that a highly political issue is impossible to get a grasp on for an outsider because everyone has a cause.

    All I know now is that I don't trust anyone on this issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Nowt.

    It's a potted biography of a genuinely clever scientist who solves problems and thinks with great clarity.

    It's an interesting read if science is your thing and you believe in being open minded on scientific issues.
    Does he believe in AGW?

    What about aliens? Ghosts?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Nice article here: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...-humanity.html that says that the melting of the tundra is releasing vast amounts of methane into the air, thereby increasing global temperatures.
    But the tundra is not melting! The temperature figures they used to infer the tundra was melting have been shown to be faked.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Its a long aeticle : can somebody summarize please? Exacgtly what is he saying about vacuum cleaners?
    Nowt.

    It's a potted biography of a genuinely clever scientist who solves problems and thinks with great clarity.

    It's an interesting read if science is your thing and you believe in being open minded on scientific issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Its a long aeticle : can somebody summarize please? Exacgtly what is he saying about vacuum cleaners?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    and as Hansen, the scientist he criticises most, says "...he should come back when he's frigged around with his computer models enough to get the results he needs to back up his hypothesis. That is what I always do!!...".
    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Nice article here: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...-humanity.html that says that the melting of the tundra is releasing vast amounts of methane into the air, thereby increasing global temperatures.

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    MMGW is like the Euro.....if you don't accept doctrine you simply don't know what you are talking about, haven't done your research, and are a heretic.

    I have found in life that when people take that sort of position, they usually turn out to be wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    I've read a fair bit of Dyson. Clever man.
    He hasn't done any work on climate change, though, and as Hansen, the scientist he criticises most, says "...he should come back when he's done his homework...".

    HTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • This one should warm things up here - not that that is scary

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/ma...1&pagewanted=1

    This one should get the forum going again.

    sas, your input is expected.

Working...
X