• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: England

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "England"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy
    If Brazil had 2 Peles you can bet your @rse their manager would have found a way of getting the best of both stack. Nice problem to have I suppose, I'd play Gerrard wide on either left or right and Lampard in behind the strikers myself.
    I thought Gerrard would make a good marauding right-back, but too many ducks have to line up for that to happen - Neville and Beckham dropped, Gerrard returns to right-back at Liverpool. All pretty unlikely.

    He would be no better than Scholes or Joe Cole on the left. I'd rather Wayne Bridge was out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    If Brazil had 2 Peles you can bet your @rse their manager would have found a way of getting the best of both stack. Nice problem to have I suppose, I'd play Gerrard wide on either left or right and Lampard in behind the strikers myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    shaunbhoy, I'd add Ashley Cole, Sol Campbell and possibly Michael Owen. That's a good bunch of players - shame about the team. They'll be better next summer though.

    As for playing Lampard and Gerrard together - it isn't as easy as you think. They are after one position. Suppose they were both right wingers, or goalies. You wouldn't try to play them both then.

    Sven has to bite the bullet and drop one of them. Has Makele got an English grandmother?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by WageSlave

    I remember long threads on the Chelsea forums about how we were all going to protest and boo Mourinho.
    That'd be the Chelsea fans that know feck all about football then. Mourinho is a class above Ranieri and has been Chelsea's most important signing.
    Getting back to England, they are going to Germany with their strongest squad in years and ought to have a good chance of returning with the trophy. For all those that say you can't play both Gerrard AND Lampard, that is a load of bollox. Those two along with Rooney, Terry, and possibly Beckham are the only top quality players they have although Owen is fairly useful too. It would be sheer folly to omit any of those 4 from a starting line-up if fit and available. The problem, and it is Erikkson's one, is to ensure you get the best out of those guys. That is something he struggles with at times. He better get it right between now and next summer or the knives will really be out. That said, I would not lose any sleep over them spectacularly underachieving again, nor would I be greatly surprised.

    Leave a comment:


  • steve'O
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Is that the Stanley Cup? Big bugger isn't it.

    Typical Women eh! don't look at the bloke just what he's holding therfore it must be large!!! the guy is a 3 foot midget, or my names not Fish, Dick Fish (Sorry Clownio)

    Leave a comment:


  • WageSlave
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    I remember when Makele first played over here, even Chelsea fans didn't rate him, and were bemused by Mourinho saying how great he was until about the time Alan Hansen pointed out on TV exactly what he did.
    To be fair, I don't think Makelele had a great first season. But that was down to Ranieri's weird tactics.

    I remember long threads on the Chelsea forums about how we were all going to protest and boo Mourinho. Ranieri is great, he's our wonderful manager. Hindsight is wonderful

    Leave a comment:


  • steve'O
    replied
    England now have 4 Chelsea players inthe starting lineup....About time they started playing the same way

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    About Ledley King - Most fans and press didn't understand the holding role until recently. The trouble is, the job is messy and unspectacular.

    Batty did it well for years but just got slated by press and fans (not by players and coaches) for being "negative", i.e. not dribbling past players, playing killer balls into the opponent's box, or firing the odd goal into the top corner from 20 yards.

    I remember when Makele first played over here, even Chelsea fans didn't rate him, and were bemused by Mourinho saying how great he was until about the time Alan Hansen pointed out on TV exactly what he did.

    Gerrard used to be a right-back. Maybe the answer is to get him back there and keep playing Ledley King in midfield. Or Parker, Carrick or Hargreaves. But definitely not Beckham, he's not good enough at it.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Is that the Stanley Cup? Big bugger isn't it.

    Leave a comment:


  • voron
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    I thought you were a comrade and supported Russia, which miserably failed yesterday with Slovakia. Couldn't score a goal.
    Of course I cheer on Rodina. Russia produces good footballers, but the side doesn't play with any national pride or determination, which is shameful.

    Now Ice Hockey is another question. There is a God, and his name is Federov...


    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by voron
    A lot of it comes down to the luck of the draw. We were very unlucky to meet Argentina in the second round of the 98 WC. Germany had a lucky draw and got to the final of the last one, despite having a dreadful team.
    I thought you were a comrade and supported Russia, which miserably failed yesterday with Slovakia. Couldn't score a goal.

    Leave a comment:


  • voron
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates
    I'm now optimistic that England will scrape through the first round of the tournament next year.
    A lot of it comes down to the luck of the draw. We were very unlucky to meet Argentina in the second round of the 98 WC. Germany had a lucky draw and got to the final of the last one, despite having a dreadful team.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by voron
    Got the victory. Fully deserved. England put in a decent performance, and certainly a marked improvement on recent games.

    Dare we be optimistic about the WC?
    You know its only going to end in tears mate...dont set yourself up with expectations the crappy england soccar team cant deliver on

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    I'm now optimistic that England will scrape through the first round of the tournament next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • voron
    replied
    Quite right, it was only one game and I wouldn't call it a great performance, but it was an improvement and we showed more desire.

    I think the match proved that the Lampard/Gerrard pairing in central midfield doesn't work. Lampard had a good game, scored, and might even have had a couple more with a bit of luck. King played well in the anchor position. If Gerrard is to be played with Lampard, I think Gerrard should take the anchor role. Great player, but for my money Lampard has the edge and certainly scores more goals.

    I like Joe Cole and think he had a good game. He's not a winger and players better in the centre, but he puts in some good balls and offers some flair and creativity, which, Rooney aside, is not something England has in great abundance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X