• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "BOOMED: City chief: Green shoots are here"

Collapse

  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Wasn't this what happened in the thirties? Slump from 31-33 : then recovery : then another big slump?
    Almost like some sort of boom then bust cycle.

    Good job those days are behind us, eh.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    If he's right it's very bad news. The assumption then would be that the current financial model ( excessive lending, living off credit) is sustainable and that no great consequences accrue from such behaviour.

    Plus house prices haven't fallen by nearly enough ...


    However as I mentioned in a thread a few days ago, I have a feeling he may be right, but for all the wrong reasons - never in history has so much money been thrown at a downturn. This is not a natural business/consumer driven recovery.
    So it will just lead to further problems down the line.
    Wasn't this what happened in the thirties? Slump from 31-33 : then recovery : then another big slump?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    This guy has an interest in saying everything is fine. I call it conflict of interest, and it is load of old cobblers !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
    I am inclined to think that the UK Government at the moment is like a person who has been on a colossal spending spree with their credit card.

    They don't know how big the bill is going to be, but they know it is going to be big and are dreading the moment it lands on the doormat because they are not sure that they are going to be able to pay it.

    They are not like that person at all because they are not responsible for the debts. Somebody else is and that is YOU !!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    http://www.moneyweek.com/investments...oney%2BMorning

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    If he's right it's very bad news. The assumption then would be that the current financial model ( excessive lending, living off credit) is sustainable and that no great consequences accrue from such behaviour.

    Plus house prices haven't fallen by nearly enough ...


    However as I mentioned in a thread a few days ago, I have a feeling he may be right, but for all the wrong reasons - never in history has so much money been thrown at a downturn. This is not a natural business/consumer driven recovery.
    So it will just lead to further problems down the line.
    I've been saying the same for weeks. All that is happening is that we are papering over the cracks....the systemic problems are not being addressed because the people the people who need to fix them have a vested interest in keeping things as they are.

    Result - in eight to ten years time, things will go belly up again...and next time it will be worse.

    My strategy is to get myself into a position where I am financially independent with a variety of unrelated revenue streams by then. Hopefully one of them will survive!

    Leave a comment:


  • Gonzo
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    However as I mentioned in a thread a few days ago, I have a feeling he may be right, but for all the wrong reasons - never in history has so much money been thrown at a downturn. This is not a natural business/consumer driven recovery.
    So it will just lead to further problems down the line.
    I am inclined to think that the UK Government at the moment is like a person who has been on a colossal spending spree with their credit card.

    They don't know how big the bill is going to be, but they know it is going to be big and are dreading the moment it lands on the doormat because they are not sure that they are going to be able to pay it.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    It would be bad news in so much as, if we get away with it this time, we are only saving it up to be worse further down the line.
    Great minds etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Good analogy

    Leave a comment:


  • Pickle2
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The more cabbage and beans people eat the faster we will reach the 'blow off phase'.
    In that case, im doing my bit for humanity for once.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    It would be bad news in so much as, if we get away with it this time, we are only saving it up to be worse further down the line.

    More likely we are just into the "Bull Trap" phase of the bubble cycle.

    See pic.

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images...p_image001.jpg
    The more cabbage and beans people eat the faster we will reach the 'blow off phase'.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pickle2
    replied
    It would be bad news in so much as, if we get away with it this time, we are only saving it up to be worse further down the line.

    More likely we are just into the "Bull Trap" phase of the bubble cycle.

    See pic.

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images...p_image001.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    If he's right it's very bad news. The assumption then would be that the current financial model ( excessive lending, living off credit) is sustainable and that no great consequences accrue from such behaviour.

    Plus house prices haven't fallen by nearly enough ...


    However as I mentioned in a thread a few days ago, I have a feeling he may be right, but for all the wrong reasons - never in history has so much money been thrown at a downturn. This is not a natural business/consumer driven recovery.
    So it will just lead to further problems down the line.
    Last edited by sasguru; 26 March 2009, 09:48.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Maybe he's right. Wouldn't that be nice?

    Ducks for cover and prepares for flame attack

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    An expert from Barclays advises and predicts. How much did they lose in subprime again?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X