• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: MP's expenses

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "MP's expenses"

Collapse

  • voodooflux
    replied
    Interesting (yes, it's another slow day at ClientCo) snippet on the Guardian data blog today showing a Google Maps mashup of MP's travel expenses by distance: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...houseofcommons

    The full map is here.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Zero. Apart form anything else, it would almost certainly contravene Human Rights legislation.

    Also whilst McNulty is twisting git, he hasn't done anything illegal (except in the court of you know where!).

    What is the Italian legislation you're talking about?
    this is one of them. I was a bit suprised to find a fair few examples

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7474474.stm


    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Anyone remember Berlusconi (sp?) bringing in legislation to make something he had done legal ?

    what are the chances that this lot will bring in some retrospective legislation at some point to make some of their dodgy dealings leal ?



    Zero. Apart form anything else, it would almost certainly contravene Human Rights legislation.

    Also whilst McNulty is twisting git, he hasn't done anything illegal (except in the court of you know where!).

    What is the Italian legislation you're talking about?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    I don't think the sleaze matters. In comparison with the lie about the "weapons of mass destruction", a few millions being stolen off the taxpayer to line their pockets are not important. Especially compared to their incompetence and mismanagement, anyway.

    Thousands of civilians have been killed.

    Scores of people have been tortured.

    How about we pay all these cabinet ministers and ex-cabinet ministers £10,000,000 tax-free to leave office. (It's cheaper than baling out the banks.)

    But on condition they stand trial for the consequences of their lies.

    I bet they wouldn't take the money.

    Most Tories voted for the war with Iraq. My (Labour) MP at the time voted against. We would've had the war if the Tories had been in power. I was against it then and I still am.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Anyone remember Berlusconi (sp?) bringing in legislation to make something he had done legal ?

    what are the chances that this lot will bring in some retrospective legislation at some point to make some of their dodgy dealings leal ?



    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by cybersquatter View Post
    Here's what I don't get: if a contractor claimed the sort of expenses these MPs are claiming for working out of town, they'd have HMRC coming down on them for tax like a ton of bricks.

    I know there's the usual 'one rule for them' sigh-and-tut response - but really - why don't HMRC give a damn?
    Totally agree -it's ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Name them. All of them should be answerable to the public that pay their salaries and expenses and if they are proven to be morally bankrupt such as McNulty and Jackie Smith, they should resign. It does appear though that Labour are the real hypocrites having preached ' whiter than white'.
    Sir Nicholas and Ann Winterton

    Conservative-MPs-Sir-Nicholas-and-Ann-Winterton-broke-Commons-expenses-rules


    Derek Conway

    BTW I agree Smith and McNulty are scum and should go - unlike you I don't think the Tories would be much better - based on their past record.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    I don't think the sleaze matters. In comparison with the lie about the "weapons of mass destruction", a few millions being stolen off the taxpayer to line their pockets are not important. Especially compared to their incompetence and mismanagement, anyway.

    Thousands of civilians have been killed.

    Scores of people have been tortured.

    How about we pay all these cabinet ministers and ex-cabinet ministers £10,000,000 tax-free to leave office. (It's cheaper than baling out the banks.)

    But on condition they stand trial for the consequences of their lies.

    I bet they wouldn't take the money.

    Leave a comment:


  • Green Mango
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Hamilton
    Not sure what that means - he took cash for questions and paid the price although not admitting his guilt.

    BLAIR - manipulated data to get us into a war in Iraq,
    - took money a million off Ecclestone in return for allowing
    tobacco to be reprieved for a few years
    - took money off private equity managers - tax law changed in their
    favour
    - took free holidays all round the words
    etc etc etc

    Labour incompetence, corruption and sleaze beggars belief ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Slumdog
    replied
    completely agree with cybersquatter.

    First home 8 miles from work place and second one 11 miles, not exactly a huge difference really

    Leave a comment:


  • cybersquatter
    replied
    Originally posted by DieScum View Post
    I've claimed expenses in permie job that have been more than many MPs.

    It wasn't a perk. I was just claiming expenses.

    So if I had to work in a different location I stayed in a hotel and claimed it back. It was just something you do to get your business done. Spending 20k on hotels a year isn't that uncommon for people who work away a lot.

    Nobody becomes an MP for the money.

    It is all a piece of nonsense.
    So have I. But claiming legitimate expenses for hotels is completely different to kitting out a second home 11 miles away with taxpayers' money.

    Could you have claimed a £200-a-night per diem? Could you have claimed for a fridge and a plasma TV? I doubt it. But if you were an MP, until recently you could.

    Leave a comment:


  • DieScum
    replied
    I've claimed expenses in permie job that have been more than many MPs.

    It wasn't a perk. I was just claiming expenses.

    So if I had to work in a different location I stayed in a hotel and claimed it back. It was just something you do to get your business done. Spending 20k on hotels a year isn't that uncommon for people who work away a lot.

    Nobody becomes an MP for the money.

    It is all a piece of nonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • cybersquatter
    replied
    Here's what I don't get: if a contractor claimed the sort of expenses these MPs are claiming for working out of town, they'd have HMRC coming down on them for tax like a ton of bricks.

    I know there's the usual 'one rule for them' sigh-and-tut response - but really - why don't HMRC give a damn?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Name them. All of them should be answerable to the public that pay their salaries and expenses and if they are proven to be morally bankrupt such as McNulty and Jackie Smith, they should resign. It does appear though that Labour are the real hypocrites having preached ' whiter than white'.
    Hamilton

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    What about all the Tories "trousering" the large sums - are they not hypocrites because we all expect them to be sleazy?

    Name them. All of them should be answerable to the public that pay their salaries and expenses and if they are proven to be morally bankrupt such as McNulty and Jackie Smith, they should resign. It does appear though that Labour are the real hypocrites having preached ' whiter than white'.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X