• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Rejected for role on environmental grounds"

Collapse

  • jmo21
    replied
    and this is yet another reason not to be a permie!

    I can just picture the company-wide email that requested vounteers for a cross departmental environmental issue council, all the meeting where they sit round a table and waffle on about what to include in the document they will have prepared in 3 months time.

    etc etc...

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Name and shame.

    I bet the assorted folks on this board can find enough non-green holes in the company to accuse them of double-standards...

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Offer to move to within 49km and ask if they have a suitable reinforced section of their carpark to allow you to do vertical takeoffs and landing in your Harrier. Those babies use quite a lot of water (and metric fvcktons of avgas) in vertical mode, they leave lovely scorch marks too.

    I wonder how their environmental policies would cope with the noise too

    It's the silliest reason for a rejection that I've ever heard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    For feck sake.

    Do you think they'd be pissed if I gave you a lift there in a lorry?

    Leave a comment:


  • mailric
    replied
    brilliant

    bloody do-gooders. they probably drive to work every day in traffic in a range rover.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I just received a phone call from an agent who says her Client won’t consider me for the role because I 'live too far away and would increase ClientCo’s carbon footprint'.


    FFS, use another agent. Submit again with a decent agent (aka: a normal one who knows how to lie). Any agent worth his/her salt would easily bullsh1t over that one and get you a foot in the door.
    Last edited by Turion; 11 March 2009, 20:53. Reason: Use a British agent. Continentals are too honest

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    The snag is I imagine the only job there is gutting fish
    Economy of the Faroe Islands

    In 2006 unemployment declined to 3%, one of the lowest rates in Europe. Nevertheless, the almost total dependence on fishing means that the economy remains extremely vulnerable.

    The introduction of Burger King in Tórshavn was widely publicized and a sign of the globalization of Faroese culture.
    or flipping burgers.


    Actually, that was cruel of me. I deleted this text: "Since 2000, new information technology and business projects have been fostered in the Faroe Islands to attract new investment" and "In 2008, the Faroes made a $52 million dollar loan to Iceland, in light of the country's banking woes"

    Also "Petroleum found close to the Faroese area gives hope for deposits in the immediate area, which may provide a basis for sustained economic prosperity." This is a worry. If they found oil, that's good. If they have found petroleum, then they are tapping into someone's else pipeline from a refinery. (Feck me, I've found an errorette on Wikipedia!)
    Last edited by BrowneIssue; 11 March 2009, 20:21.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    If they have a bit more common sense in the Faroe Islands than here I might consider doing that.
    The snag is I imagine the only job there is gutting fish

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by OrangeHopper View Post
    Who in this country deals in kilometres?
    mmmm, thats a clue Holmes.

    Yes. this is a two pipe problem Watson.

    Leave a comment:


  • OrangeHopper
    replied
    Who in this country deals in kilometres?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sausage Surprise
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    This is the biggest load of arse I've heard of in a long time - on the other hand you could see it as a lucky escape - what kind of a gang of morons are they likely to be to work for if they come up with this twaddle?

    Ring the paper though - it'd make a great news story.
    Brilliant idea - name and shame the numpties

    Leave a comment:


  • pedroPM
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    I suspect that that "reason" might be illegal in some shape or form... I'd do what PSB is recommending - call the papers. You'll probably have to have your photo taken looking either dejected or angry.
    or just down right bemused!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    This is the biggest load of arse I've heard of in a long time - on the other hand you could see it as a lucky escape - what kind of a gang of morons are they likely to be to work for if they come up with this twaddle?

    Ring the paper though - it'd make a great news story.
    I suspect that that "reason" might be illegal in some shape or form... I'd do what PSB is recommending - call the papers. You'll probably have to have your photo taken looking either dejected or angry.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    It's obviously a KPI, and of course KPIs are the be all and end all of large organisations.
    LOB = Load of bollox

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Political Correctness Gone Mad <tm>
    I think companies can get tax breaks for this kind of thing? Or it can be a big deal to customers if a company is good on this kind of thing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X