• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The state within the state"

Collapse

  • realityhack
    replied
    Multiculturalism and integration are mutually exclusive ideologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    There's nothing he can do because all fuzzy wuzzies dole types, benefit claimants, rapists, child molesters, mass murderers, tax inspectors, wheel clampers and traffic warders, vote Labour.

    apparently

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    I heard that, and actually the drift from the muslim spokesmen was that although polygamy was allowed, it was subject to such strong restrictions in terms of fairness (of the man to his wives) and such caveats in the Koran about its only being suitable when really needed, that the effect was that it was deliberately intended to be rare, not the norm; and most muslim men should not imagine doing it.
    I thought one of them said the Koran only allows it if your first wife can't have any more children. Which made me think of those Saudi prince's with dozens of wives, and how unlucky they must have been.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Yup, because it is the minorities that win the marginal seats in an election, and thus national power for HMG.
    David Cameron is no Idi Amin, what's he going to do about it?

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Thanks for the contribution. Could you just go ahead and delete that post?
    Or fix the quote, how lazy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Expat, you're right. We are either multicultural or we're not, we either integrate or we don't. What we seem to be doing is pandering to the minorities.

    Yup, because it is the minorities that win the marginal seats in an election, and thus national power for HMG.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    There was some interview on R4 this morning about polygamy and religious marriages. They rolled out a couple of spokespeople from muslim organisations and I could see where the interview was headed so I switched it off.
    I heard that, and actually the drift from the muslim spokesmen was that although polygamy was allowed, it was subject to such strong restrictions in terms of fairness (of the man to his wives) and such caveats in the Koran about its only being suitable when really needed, that the effect was that it was deliberately intended to be rare, not the norm; and most muslim men should not imagine doing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    There was some interview on R4 this morning about polygamy and religious marriages. They rolled out a couple of spokespeople from muslim organisations and I could see where the interview was headed so I switched it off.

    Expat, you're right. We are either multicultural or we're not, we either integrate or we don't. What we seem to be doing is pandering to the minorities.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    ...According to the management committee of London's Madani Secondary Girls' School, this is because "our children are exposed to a culture that is in opposition with almost everything Islam stands for". The response to this sense of danger is often to forbid outright any kind of relationship with non-Muslims: "Allah has warned us in the Koran, do not befriend the kuffaar."
    I alwys have a problem with logical inconsistency. Are we a multicultural society or not? If my children have to mix with people from other cultures, surely so do they?

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post

    HTH.
    Thanks for the contribution. Could you just go ahead and delete that post?

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    [QUOTE=ace00;777369]I'm surprised this hasn't been done already fellow Torygraph readers.

    I believe politics 101 is that you must not allow the creation of an alternate state within the state as this leads to dissolution.

    I have for some time thought that New Labours most heinous piece of crapulence, and they are many, is that they have encouraged religious schools (Islamic) as it saves them having to do their job.
    As any fool know, children don't discriminate. So educate the kids together and they will grow to know and accept, respect each other and their cultures.

    Now read this:

    Music, chess and cricket are just three things banned in some Muslim schools in the UK. Others are drama, dance, sport, Shakespeare, and, in some cases, any aspect of Western culture whatever. According to the management committee of London's Madani Secondary Girls' School, this is because "our children are exposed to a culture that is in opposition with almost everything Islam stands for". The response to this sense of danger is often to forbid outright any kind of relationship with non-Muslims: "Allah has warned us in the Koran, do not befriend the kuffaar. The Jews and Christians will never be content with you until you follow their way," says Riyadhul Haq, a teacher in Kidderminster.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...-is-a-sin.html


    Good luck with fixing that problem.[/QUOTE]

    Not my problem to fix.

    HTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    started a topic The state within the state

    The state within the state

    I'm surprised this hasn't been done already fellow Torygraph readers.

    I believe politics 101 is that you must not allow the creation of an alternate state within the state as this leads to dissolution.

    I have for some time thought that New Labours most heinous piece of crapulence, and they are many, is that they have encouraged religious schools (Islamic) as it saves them having to do their job.
    As any fool know, children don't discriminate. So educate the kids together and they will grow to know and accept, respect each other and their cultures.

    Now read this:

    Music, chess and cricket are just three things banned in some Muslim schools in the UK. Others are drama, dance, sport, Shakespeare, and, in some cases, any aspect of Western culture whatever. According to the management committee of London's Madani Secondary Girls' School, this is because "our children are exposed to a culture that is in opposition with almost everything Islam stands for". The response to this sense of danger is often to forbid outright any kind of relationship with non-Muslims: "Allah has warned us in the Koran, do not befriend the kuffaar. The Jews and Christians will never be content with you until you follow their way," says Riyadhul Haq, a teacher in Kidderminster.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...-is-a-sin.html


    Good luck with fixing that problem.

Working...
X