Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Nuclear defence strategy
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Nuclear defence strategy"
Collapse
-
Stand back a bit and look at the West's energy policies, you'd have to say that with some exceptions these are the actions of people who are happy with the current geopolitical situation. I'm not.
-
Expat, I agree with you totally.Originally posted by expat View PostAbandon Trident.
Build nuclear power stations and keep out of oil wars.
It would be far better to spend the money on new energy technologies like Fusion, so that we don't need to rely on oil any more.
Leave a comment:
-
That's why we annexed Scotland. It just didn't work.Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostYeah, can't we outsouce our moaning? ..and make another country miserable
Leave a comment:
-
But it was from the MailOriginally posted by Bagpuss View PostSense never went down well on CUK. Hysterical ranting about factually flawed tabloid/Daily Mail journalism yeah yeah yeah
But the Trident fleet is an anachronism... Actually, the main nuclear defence we need is a programme to build several dozen nuclear power stations, so that we can have energy independence in the coming lean times.
Leave a comment:
-
...with plenty quickness and very knowledge.Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostSense never went down well on CUK. Hysterical ranting about factually flawed tabloid/Daily Mail journalism yeah yeah yeah
The sooner you assimilate and start regurgitating a daily diet of anti Labour peppered diatribe the (un)happier you will be.
Your mind is ours!
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, that is frankly unhelpful rubbish.Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostSense never went down well on CUK. Hysterical ranting about factually flawed tabloid/Daily Mail journalism yeah yeah yeah
Leave a comment:
-
Sense never went down well on CUK. Hysterical ranting about factually flawed tabloid/Daily Mail journalism yeah yeah yeah
The sooner you assimilate and start regurgitating a daily diet of anti Labour peppered diatribe the (un)happier you will be.
Your mind is ours!
Leave a comment:
-
Nuclear defence strategy
Abandon Trident.
Build nuclear power stations and keep out of oil wars.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: