- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Jacqui Smith's expenses
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Jacqui Smith's expenses"
Collapse
-
That depends whether you or your brother's a member of the Labour party.Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostTo put it this way - could you imagine the inland revenue letting me expense my mortgage & home bills if I happened to be staying with my brother for 4 nights of the week.
Leave a comment:
-
I can't understand why more isn't being made of this and why people are not jumping up and down over it. Firstly we have the MP's expenses for a second home which is open to abuse on a massive scale. If I work away from home and rent a 2nd home I cannot furnish it with all the nice things I have at my first home and get them as a tax free gift. But these are the rules the MP's have voted for themselves.
What she has done is take it to the next stage. She is living with her sister and paying a tiny rent but using her 2nd home allowence to pay the bills on her first home. This has to be wrong. If she had rented a place in London and charged expenses for that then ok but what she is doing is supplementing her income by charging expenses to her primary home.
The simple fact is - her second home is the one in London - by definition it should be the place the MP needs to use to carry out their duties in Westminster. Her main house simply is not this. What should be done is she should be made to refund all the money she has claimed over the years less the amount she has paid in rent and bills while staying at her sisters house.
To put it this way - could you imagine the inland revenue letting me expense my mortgage & home bills if I happened to be staying with my brother for 4 nights of the week.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ruprect View PostMore allegations as (brave) neighbours speak up:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5762376.ece
Surely this could force a resignation (I hope so)? Not that any of this cabinet have the dignity or cojones to actually go do it.
parliament
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
£116K over SIX years! So an average of about 20K per year.Originally posted by Ruprect View Post£116000 of taxpayers money in expenses. £116000.
Jeez, you try sticking that on your tax return and see how long it takes before hector comes knocking.
More quality journalism from the beeb.
Edit: I'm not defending her claiming somewhere she stays 2-3 nights a week as her main home.
Leave a comment:
-
£116000 of taxpayers money in expenses. £116000.
Jeez, you try sticking that on your tax return and see how long it takes before hector comes knocking.
Leave a comment:
-
There's something about being Home Office Secretary and Corruption. How many recent Home Office Secretary's have resigned in the past few years?
They think that because the control the police that they can do what they like.
Lets see what stalinist diabtribes she comes out with now..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ruprect View PostMore allegations as (brave) neighbours speak up:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5762376.ece
Surely this could force a resignation (I hope so)? Not that any of this cabinet have the dignity or cojones to actually go do it.
inspiring
From the article: -
"They said that the presence of a police officer outside the house was no guide to when she was at home."
Utter gonads, shirley?
Leave a comment:
-
Jacqui Smith's expenses
More allegations as (brave) neighbours speak up:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5762376.ece
Surely this could force a resignation (I hope so)? Not that any of this cabinet have the dignity or cojones to actually go do it.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: