Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Racist Scum !!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Racist Scum !!"
Collapse
-
That proves Bob Shawadiwadi’s an idiot. If he had a brain he’d charge 749 pounds.Originally posted by oracleslave View PostWhat happens if I am available and have the skills at £750 per day and Bob Shawadiwadi is available at £200 per day?
Leave a comment:
-
What happens if I am available and have the skills at £750 per day and Bob Shawadiwadi is available at £200 per day?Originally posted by ratewhore View PostApparently I've gone on expats. No matter.
Anyway, back to my point. If it has been proved there are no local workers with the skills to fulfil this construction (I believe) project, then fair enough. If there are the local skills available, I can't see how it can be justified. Note that I am not saying thats what EU law does or does not state, just that I can't see how it can be justified...
Leave a comment:
-
In the US
In the US, if they chose to employ workers from Michigan in Calafornia at a lower rate they are allowed to do that.Originally posted by ratewhore View PostWithout wanting to get into a cock-fight with you people, I thought I'd add a comment relating to the main point of the thread, and it is this:
If I recall correctly (and I may not be up to date), in the US, a company cannot offer a job to a non-US resident unless the job has been offered to US residents first and a skilled US resident cannot be found.
Why can't we do that? Seems fair enough to me...
The way I see it, thats what is happening here, its not really right, but in effect the EU is a federation in many respects and we belong to that federation so what they are doing is probably a mistake for the local image of the company and morally wrong, but its legal.
UK is not really a wholly separate country. You can theoretically work and live anywhere in the EU. Thats what we voted for.... or how the "democratic" referendum would have turned out if the government had bothered to actually honour there pledge to hold a referendum about it. Or then again if it hadnt we would have voted until it did turn out that way. Have to love democracy.
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently I've gone on expats. No matter.Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostCareful, that might be seen as tantamount to indirectly validating Cyber's original comment, and you'll get put on people's ignore lists, because that's what this Forum has now become.
Nasty, petty, small-minded, and vindictive.
Anyway, back to my point. If it has been proved there are no local workers with the skills to fulfil this construction (I believe) project, then fair enough. If there are the local skills available, I can't see how it can be justified. Note that I am not saying thats what EU law does or does not state, just that I can't see how it can be justified...
Leave a comment:
-
Careful, that might be seen as tantamount to indirectly validating Cyber's original comment, and you'll get put on people's ignore lists, because that's what this Forum has now become.Why can't we do that? Seems fair enough to me...
Nasty, petty, small-minded, and vindictive.
Leave a comment:
-
In theory, we do exactly that. In order to employ a foreign national and grant a work permit any position must have been advertised for at least a year (though it does not have to be permanently advertised for the duration of this period). It must be proved that no UK resident has sufficient skill to do the work and that reasonable efforts have been made to recruit UK national workers.Originally posted by ratewhore View PostWithout wanting to get into a cock-fight with you people, I thought I'd add a comment relating to the main point of the thread, and it is this:
If I recall correctly (and I may not be up to date), in the US, a company cannot offer a job to a non-US resident unless the job has been offered to US residents first and a skilled US resident cannot be found.
Why can't we do that? Seems fair enough to me...
Leave a comment:
-
Without wanting to get into a cock-fight with you people, I thought I'd add a comment relating to the main point of the thread, and it is this:
If I recall correctly (and I may not be up to date), in the US, a company cannot offer a job to a non-US resident unless the job has been offered to US residents first and a skilled US resident cannot be found.
Why can't we do that? Seems fair enough to me...
Leave a comment:
-
So you ignore people and then respond to their posts anyway?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostHe’s on ignore. Is he on about British blobs for British shirkers again?
Saw this in the mash today.
Hang on, which of is is on ignore... me or the OP?
Leave a comment:
-
Well worth it in this instance.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostHe’s on ignore.
Leave a comment:
-
He’s on ignore. Is he on about British blobs for British shirkers again?Originally posted by d000hg View PostThey come out in the snow to protest, bet if there was no strike they'd have stayed at home because of the snow... maybe the companies want to hire people who are willing to work hard.
Saw this in the mash today.
Leave a comment:
-
They come out in the snow to protest, bet if there was no strike they'd have stayed at home because of the snow... maybe the companies want to hire people who are willing to work hard.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Leave a comment: