• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Reposession story

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Reposession story"

Collapse

  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    If one of us paid ourselves huge amounts of money which our Ltd Co's didn't really own - like if the Ltd borrowed the money and then paid it to the director - and then the Ltd went under, unable to pay its debts... wouldn't we have to pay the money back by selling our houses and belongings? .............
    No. That's why it's called "Ltd."

    Leave a comment:


  • zara_backdog
    replied
    Originally posted by Tensai View Post
    Generally a repossessed property is sold quickly and cheaply at auction which often leaves a remaining debt for the previous owner, particularly after adding in all the outstanding interest payments and legal fees.

    Net result is the poor sod finds himself still in debt, and being chased by debt collection agencies who the bank sold the debt to at a discount. It's a common misconception that you can just hand in your keys and walk away unscathed.
    Hum - property is not always sold quickly after a reposession, can be up to 12months - there is a lot of red tape to go through before ther BS can sell the property, or simply they hold on to it for a while - out-come is the poor sod founds him/herself in even more dept.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tensai
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    .... so they could repossess any time they liked and still get their money back.
    Generally a repossessed property is sold quickly and cheaply at auction which often leaves a remaining debt for the previous owner, particularly after adding in all the outstanding interest payments and legal fees.

    Net result is the poor sod finds himself still in debt, and being chased by debt collection agencies who the bank sold the debt to at a discount. It's a common misconception that you can just hand in your keys and walk away unscathed.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    The bank was never betting on the window cleaner being able to pay his mortgage. They were half expecting him not to be able to pay it: but that it wouldn't make any difference because the house would go up and up in value, so they could repossess any time they liked and still get their money back. Maybe they still can. Creditworthiness has little to do with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    If one of us paid ourselves huge amounts of money which our Ltd Co's didn't really own - like if the Ltd borrowed the money and then paid it to the director - and then the Ltd went under, unable to pay its debts... wouldn't we have to pay the money back by selling our houses and belongings? What I mean is, are all these bankers that have been getting huge bonuses for years, funded by fake money, going to be made to give any of it back... or is it just written off and they can keep it? What is the difference? Why are some of these schemes classed as fraud, and some as just normal banking practise?
    They don't give it to themselves, the sharehlders vote on whether they should have it. Just ocasionally, the shareholders vote no.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Nice bit of selective quoting. To be fair to him, he also said this:



    and this:



    Don't forget, he went out and cleaned windows for a living, unlike some of the flipless tosspots out there...

    DP was suggesting that the bank, not the buyer, were at fault here.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    If you read between the lines this guy was already up to his eyes in poo from previous credit problems, and they have forced the sale having found he now had an asset to seize...

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Isn't the stunning piece of news here that they gave a mortgage to someone who actually had a job? I didn't think they did that any more...

    Leave a comment:


  • dinker
    replied
    If the banks refused to lend him money all the Lefties would be whinging that it wasn`t "fair", that he was being "discriminated" against for being thick and that he was being "excluded" from the financial system. Recognise any of these key words? They are the tools of Marxist oppression.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Don't knock it. Good money to be made in window cleaning. Especially if you have a niche market.
    You can always sell the film rights if the work dries up!

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Don't knock it. Good money to be made in window cleaning. Especially if you have a niche market.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    If one of us paid ourselves huge amounts of money which our Ltd Co's didn't really own - like if the Ltd borrowed the money and then paid it to the director - and then the Ltd went under, unable to pay its debts... wouldn't we have to pay the money back by selling our houses and belongings? What I mean is, are all these bankers that have been getting huge bonuses for years, funded by fake money, going to be made to give any of it back... or is it just written off and they can keep it? What is the difference? Why are some of these schemes classed as fraud, and some as just normal banking practise?
    That's a fundamental question which deserves a thread of it's own.

    Leave a comment:


  • dang65
    replied
    If one of us paid ourselves huge amounts of money which our Ltd Co's didn't really own - like if the Ltd borrowed the money and then paid it to the director - and then the Ltd went under, unable to pay its debts... wouldn't we have to pay the money back by selling our houses and belongings? What I mean is, are all these bankers that have been getting huge bonuses for years, funded by fake money, going to be made to give any of it back... or is it just written off and they can keep it? What is the difference? Why are some of these schemes classed as fraud, and some as just normal banking practise?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Nice bit of selective quoting. To be fair to him, he also said this:

    "I feel sad that the house is going, but I hope I will be able to come to terms with it. I have had bigger disappointments in my life,"
    and this:

    I will be sorry when it has gone, but it is not the end of my world. It is only bricks and mortar in the end, and nobody has died.
    Don't forget, he went out and cleaned windows for a living, unlike some of the feckless tosspots out there...

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009...property-money

    Paul McHugh began the new year with the prospect of his home going under the hammer after he had experiencing the trauma of repossession. The 40-year-old self-employed window cleaner is set to lose his former council house in Castleford, West Yorkshire, on Wednesday, when bailiffs repossess it.

    Paul McHugh was given a £20,000 incentive from the council to buy his property, but he ran into financial difficulty because he had a financial asset for the first time in his life and was chased by creditors for previous unpaid bills. "I signed a self-certifying note to take out the mortgage, but I don't think I was the sort of person who really should have had a mortgage," he adds.


    No shlt sherlock.



    This is the sort of crap the bankers have been creaming money on and now we, the tax payer, have to foot the bill.

    Only "fair".
    Shoorlay shum mishtake ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X