- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Overcrowding
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Overcrowding"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostIn the climate change thread, someone said that the planet is overpopulated with Homo-Sapiens.
It does seem madness to encourage population growth all around the world in the name of "humanity", when anyone with a modicum of forethought can see that, contrarily, it will lead to ultimate humanitarian disaster as resources run out and the environment (forestation mainly) is f***ed.
But what can we do about it as a nation? What about:
1. Stop sending aid to crowded countries or countries with increasing populations
2. Stabilize our own population with a one-out, one-in policy
3. Send Andyw on a world tour with a van-load of condoms
Any other suggestions?
two-out
Leave a comment:
-
Problem with (1) is that number of kids is directly correlated with wealth so really we need to raise the standard of living in poor countries. Aid is very inefficient at doing this.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostIn the climate change thread, someone said that the planet is overpopulated with Homo-Sapiens.
..............
1. Stop sending aid to crowded countries or countries with increasing populations
2. Stabilize our own population with a one-out, one-in policy
..........?
And for 2, well Europe, Russia, Japan are already de-populating (without immigration). Asia, Americas are relatively stable. So we have a ME & Africa demographic problem and we are seeing the results of that already.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, but the Italian would stop for a glass of wine and a singalong with the Spaniard, The Englishman would be pugilistic but too pissed to be of any effect and the German would appoint himself obersturmbannfuhrer and ruin everything that’s attractive about the place.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostActually, thinking about it we'd only need 4 troops - one to invade from England, one from Italy, one from Spain and one from Germany. They'd go completely nuts figuring out which direction to surrender too...
Leave a comment:
-
Actually, thinking about it we'd only need 4 troops - one to invade from England, one from Italy, one from Spain and one from Germany. They'd go completely nuts figuring out which direction to surrender too...Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIt sounds like a lot of hard work. If Gordon hadn’t pissed away all the money we could have bought it a few years back.
Leave a comment:
-
It sounds like a lot of hard work. If Gordon hadn’t pissed away all the money we could have bought it a few years back.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostI keep saying - invade France. You know it makes sense.
Leave a comment:
-
Now they're developing the Oil Industry in Africa, it's only a matter of timm before America gets "interested" in the wars over there!
Leave a comment:
-
Bomb the Middle East out of existence? I think the U.S. generally has this covered. This would help on several fronts:-
1) It would grind islamic terrorism to a halt.
2) Millions of people would be wiped out and hence there would be less drain on the planet's resources.
3) People in that region tend to have numerous children, which in turn bear very large families. The chain propagates and is probably the largest contributor to world population growth. This would cease immediately.
4) Free oil once the area is neutralised.
Leave a comment:
-
Yep. Pretend it isn't happening and instead ask science why the environment is being wrecked and why we are running out of room and resources. More research is required to get to the root of this complex and mystifying problem
Leave a comment:
-
4. Trip to that clinic in Switzerland for persistent Labour voters.
Leave a comment:
-
Overcrowding
In the climate change thread, someone said that the planet is overpopulated with Homo-Sapiens.
It does seem madness to encourage population growth all around the world in the name of "humanity", when anyone with a modicum of forethought can see that, contrarily, it will lead to ultimate humanitarian disaster as resources run out and the environment (forestation mainly) is f***ed.
But what can we do about it as a nation? What about:
1. Stop sending aid to crowded countries or countries with increasing populations
2. Stabilize our own population with a one-out, one-in policy
3. Send Andyw on a world tour with a van-load of condoms
Any other suggestions?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: