• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The City....big loser in 2009?"

Collapse

  • Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    No

    next
    WHS - Nope city will get its status back.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    Good riddance to the lot of them - would you ever want to work in such a shoddy sleazy sector such as Financial Markets - just look at the stress levels that are in store for you ...
    Yes! For £500+ a day, I'll work in a shoddy sleazy sector and put up with a bit of stress

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    There's a lot of potential taxpayers that could be lost to the UK, and let's face it, Labour need them !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Winners and losers 2009

    Interesting, predicting banks hoofing off to the continent and leaving the City.

    Will the City lose its premier status as "the" financial capital?
    No

    next

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Good riddance to the lot of them - would you ever want to work in such a shoddy sleazy sector such as Financial Markets - just look at the stress levels that are in store for you ...

    937 financial markets professionals took part in our Financial Markets Stress Survey last week.

    Here's the 'stressed-out' bankers firm league table (where staff feel more stressed than they did just 6 months ago) :

    1. Bear Stearns - 98.3%

    2. Morgan Stanley - 97.1%

    3. Royal Bank of Scotland - 91.5%

    4. Lehman Brothers - 89.2%

    5. SG Corporate & Investment Banking - 72.1%

    6. UBS - 71.6%

    7. Bank of America - 70.9%

    8. Merrill Lynch - 70.8%

    9. Dresdner Kleinwort - 70.7%

    10. Barclays Capital - 69.8%

    11. Citigroup - 69.7%

    12. Schroders - 67.4%

    13. HSBC Investment Bank - 66.9%

    14. Deutsche Bank - 66.4%

    15. ABN AMRO - 61.9%

    16. Goldman Sachs - 61.2%

    17. JPMorgan - 58.8%

    18. Credit Suisse - 54.5%

    19. State Street - 50.4%

    20. BNP Paribas - 48.7%

    21. Nomura International - 47.3%

    22. Bank of New York Mellon - 46.1%

    23. Wachovia - 45.8%

    24. Morley Fund Management - 44.3%

    25. BlackRock - 41.6%

    And here's the other results:

    Overall, 71.4% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    69.1% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more of the following signs of stress:

    Trouble sleeping, escaping through drinking more, decreased appetite, inability to concentrate, general loss of productivity, getting sick more, short temper, more frequent bad moods, isolating yourself from friends and family and general apathy.

    46.8% of respondents said that they were actively trying to manage their stress.

    23.5% said that they weren't, but were going to start now.

    29.7% said that they feel that they can't do anything about it.

    FRONT OFFICE

    75.6% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    71.1% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    42.9% of respondents said that they were actively trying to manage their stress.

    25.9% said that they weren't, but were going to start now.

    31.2% said that they feel that they can't do anything about it.

    MIDDLE OFFICE

    66.9% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    63.1% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    46.3% of respondents said that they were actively trying to manage their stress.

    23.1% said that they weren't, but were going to start now.

    30.6% said that they feel that they can't do anything about it.

    BACK OFFICE

    68.9% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    70.2% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    51.6% of respondents said that they were actively trying to manage their stress.

    20.8% said that they weren't, but were going to start now.

    27.6% said that they feel that they can't do anything about it.

    REGIONAL RESULTS

    The Americas -

    72.8% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    75.1% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    Asia-Pac

    62.8% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    65.1% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    Europe, Middle East & Africa

    71.5% of respondents said that they felt more stressed out than they did 6 months ago.

    68.2% said that they were exhibiting 3 or more signs of stress.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    started a topic The City....big loser in 2009?

    The City....big loser in 2009?

    Winners and losers 2009

    Interesting, predicting banks hoofing off to the continent and leaving the City.

    Will the City lose its premier status as "the" financial capital?

Working...
X