• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "And the winner is..."

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Just when I thought atW had plumbed the depths of economic BS, I read this...
    We can all BS in economics...

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    So would want money to be linked to reality : like being on the gold standard.

    It was going off the gold standard earliest that saved us from the worst of the great depression.

    Economics makes a huge amount of difference to everyone : Any implementation of atw's policies would send us back to the dark ages.

    I am not going to pretend I know alot of economics : but I know a pile of s**t when I see it.
    No quite, since Gold can't do work. It's a rare element with no intrinsic value, excepting its properties that enable work to be done. Its value is not stable, or a law of physics. Interestingly in the dark ages, money probably was linked to energy. Then things went horribly wrong about 5-10,000 years ago when fictional money arrived on the scene.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    I havn't thought through all the minutia of how to unify money with energy, but I had considered intellectual and other value added work. The value of SKA for example would be represented by what someone would pay for it in terms of a monatary unity, just as before, but now that unit would be the joule rather than something fictional like money or the energy it would release by being burnt. We could always work back to see if something was being overvalued though. Sorry, can't go into more details - it's presently just a half-baked economics theory that I doubt I will take further
    Just when I thought atW had plumbed the depths of economic BS, I read this...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Having read the views in the thread, I would say Atw clearly has the edge.
    Do you mean edge as on the edge of a nervous breakdown?

    Lets hope whichever secure unit he goes to has no internet access....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    IMO economics has no solution and one opinion or theory is as good or carp as the next. Its foundation, money, isn't even a real quantity FFS. Surely this isn't news, considering all the carp we get from 'real' money experts? Unify money with energy I say (inflation would be impossible without violating the laws of physics) - and the units are the same (work done, measured in units of Joules/jewels)
    So would want money to be linked to reality : like being on the gold standard.

    It was going off the gold standard earliest that saved us from the worst of the great depression.

    Economics makes a huge amount of difference to everyone : Any implementation of atw's policies would send us back to the dark ages.

    I am not going to pretend I know alot of economics : but I know a pile of s**t when I see it.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Having read the views in the thread, I would say Atw clearly has the edge.
    There is a good book called "The Confederacy of Dunces" I believe

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It won't cover plenty of cases where intellectual efforts are involved, meaning we will go back to the stone age where firewood and some food were top priority. Perfect scenario for backwards countries whose main asset is the oil in the ground dug out using equipment invented in the west.
    I havn't thought through all the minutia of how to unify money with energy, but I had considered intellectual and other value added work. The value of SKA for example would be represented by what someone would pay for it in terms of a monatary unity, just as before, but now that unit would be the joule rather than something fictional like money or the energy it would release by being burnt. We could always work back to see if something was being overvalued though. Sorry, can't go into more details - it's presently just a half-baked economics theory that I doubt I will take further

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Having read the views in the thread, I would say Atw clearly has the edge.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Unify money with energy I say
    It won't cover plenty of cases where intellectual efforts are involved, meaning we will go back to the stone age where firewood and some food were top priority. Perfect scenario for backwards countries whose main asset is the oil in the ground dug out using equipment invented in the west.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    IMO economics has no solution and one opinion or theory is as good or carp as the next. Its foundation, money, isn't even a real quantity FFS. Surely this isn't news, considering all the carp we get from 'real' money experts? Unify money with energy I say (inflation would be impossible without violating the laws of physics) - and the units are the same (work done, measured in units of Joules/jewels)

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Well I read the other thread and I thought AtW won it hands down.

    His economic and other views and theories are no more carp than others expressed on this forum and his search engine appears to be progressing quite well considering the scale of the effort required. I’d give it the benefit of the doubt for some years yet, for a project as mammoth as that.

    He should never be allowed to own a gun in the UK though…

    Nice avatar btw

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Nice avatar btw
    Yes I quite liked it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Well I read the other thread and I thought AtW won it hands down.

    His economic and other views and theories are no more carp than others expressed on this forum and his search engine appears to be progressing quite well considering the scale of the effort required. I’d give it the benefit of the doubt for some years yet, for a project as mammoth as that.

    He should never be allowed to own a gun in the UK though…

    Nice avatar btw

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
    Only if you promise to spend it on a hooker and get some of that virginal frustration out.
    Sure, I'll leave the money until I am 90 years old or so: my natural charms will probably get a bit blunt by then, so I might need the money.

    Go on then, I called your bluff mate, you now need to organise collection of £100 - this is essentially a bet, so you need to cough up with the money - I promise you that if I break my word and post in 2009 I will return you the money and 50% on top

    Leave a comment:


  • DiscoStu
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    For £100 I will stop posting for a year, that's only 30 pence per day (or less). Would you organise a collection for me?
    Only if you promise to spend it on a hooker and get some of that virginal frustration out.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X