Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: And the winner is...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "And the winner is..."
Collapse
-
No quite, since Gold can't do work. It's a rare element with no intrinsic value, excepting its properties that enable work to be done. Its value is not stable, or a law of physics. Interestingly in the dark ages, money probably was linked to energy. Then things went horribly wrong about 5-10,000 years ago when fictional money arrived on the scene.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSo would want money to be linked to reality : like being on the gold standard.
It was going off the gold standard earliest that saved us from the worst of the great depression.
Economics makes a huge amount of difference to everyone : Any implementation of atw's policies would send us back to the dark ages.
I am not going to pretend I know alot of economics : but I know a pile of s**t when I see it.
Leave a comment:
-
Just when I thought atW had plumbed the depths of economic BS, I read this...Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI havn't thought through all the minutia of how to unify money with energy, but I had considered intellectual and other value added work. The value of SKA for example would be represented by what someone would pay for it in terms of a monatary unity, just as before, but now that unit would be the joule rather than something fictional like money or the energy it would release by being burnt. We could always work back to see if something was being overvalued though. Sorry, can't go into more details - it's presently just a half-baked economics theory that I doubt I will take further
Leave a comment:
-
So would want money to be linked to reality : like being on the gold standard.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostIMO economics has no solution and one opinion or theory is as good or carp as the next. Its foundation, money, isn't even a real quantity FFS. Surely this isn't news, considering all the carp we get from 'real' money experts? Unify money with energy I say (inflation would be impossible without violating the laws of physics) - and the units are the same (work done, measured in units of Joules/jewels)
It was going off the gold standard earliest that saved us from the worst of the great depression.
Economics makes a huge amount of difference to everyone : Any implementation of atw's policies would send us back to the dark ages.
I am not going to pretend I know alot of economics : but I know a pile of s**t when I see it.
Leave a comment:
-
I havn't thought through all the minutia of how to unify money with energy, but I had considered intellectual and other value added work. The value of SKA for example would be represented by what someone would pay for it in terms of a monatary unity, just as before, but now that unit would be the joule rather than something fictional like money or the energy it would release by being burnt. We could always work back to see if something was being overvalued though. Sorry, can't go into more details - it's presently just a half-baked economics theory that I doubt I will take furtherOriginally posted by AtW View PostIt won't cover plenty of cases where intellectual efforts are involved, meaning we will go back to the stone age where firewood and some food were top priority. Perfect scenario for backwards countries whose main asset is the oil in the ground dug out using equipment invented in the west.
Leave a comment:
-
Having read the views in the thread, I would say Atw clearly has the edge.
Leave a comment:
-
It won't cover plenty of cases where intellectual efforts are involved, meaning we will go back to the stone age where firewood and some food were top priority. Perfect scenario for backwards countries whose main asset is the oil in the ground dug out using equipment invented in the west.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostUnify money with energy I say
Leave a comment:
-
IMO economics has no solution and one opinion or theory is as good or carp as the next. Its foundation, money, isn't even a real quantity FFS. Surely this isn't news, considering all the carp we get from 'real' money experts? Unify money with energy I say (inflation would be impossible without violating the laws of physics) - and the units are the same (work done, measured in units of Joules/jewels)Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostWell I read the other thread and I thought AtW won it hands down.
His economic and other views and theories are no more carp than others expressed on this forum and his search engine appears to be progressing quite well considering the scale of the effort required. I’d give it the benefit of the doubt for some years yet, for a project as mammoth as that.
He should never be allowed to own a gun in the UK though…
Nice avatar btw
Leave a comment:
-
Well I read the other thread and I thought AtW won it hands down.
His economic and other views and theories are no more carp than others expressed on this forum and his search engine appears to be progressing quite well considering the scale of the effort required. I’d give it the benefit of the doubt for some years yet, for a project as mammoth as that.
He should never be allowed to own a gun in the UK though…
Nice avatar btw
Leave a comment:
-
Sure, I'll leave the money until I am 90 years old or so: my natural charms will probably get a bit blunt by then, so I might need the money.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostOnly if you promise to spend it on a hooker and get some of that virginal frustration out.
Go on then, I called your bluff mate, you now need to organise collection of £100 - this is essentially a bet, so you need to cough up with the money - I promise you that if I break my word and post in 2009 I will return you the money and 50% on top
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: