• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Bring back Maggie

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bring back Maggie"

Collapse

  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Mustang View Post
    Strangely enough I find myself agreeing with DA in this and subsequent posts in the thread! Who'ld have thought?!
    Just goes to show musty how honest we can be

    Leave a comment:


  • Mustang
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    What Maggie did was expose the myth that socialism was a well meaning benign ideology. She showed that even the working classes were quite capable of owning property, getting a job other than working in the local pit, and that people did not need the state after all.
    Strangely enough I find myself agreeing with DA in this and subsequent posts in the thread! Who'ld have thought?!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    DA would you agree that the unregulated free market is to blame for the mess we're now in? My take is that the Conservatives were successful in turning the country around, but that the mantra of monetarism and free market ideology over-rode common sense. That is always the case when a group of people think they have found the "truth" whether it's right or left-wingers.
    History tells us that reality in economics is always somewhere in between.
    I would also argue that in an age of globalism (which wasn't around when Thatcher was in power) the free market can work against the interests of a country. To what extent we are only just beginning to find out.
    WHS

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    DA would you agree that the unregulated free market is to blame for the mess we're now in? My take is that the Conservatives were successful in turning the country around, but that the mantra of monetarism and free market ideology over-rode common sense. That is always the case when a group of people think they have found the "truth" whether it's right or left-wingers.
    History tells us that reality in economics is always somewhere in between.
    I would also argue that in an age of globalism (which wasn't around when Thatcher was in power) the free market can work against the interests of a country. To what extent we are only just beginning to find out.

    like a firearm, the gun may be fit for purpose but its whoever is holding it that we must worry about.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    In the early 90's I thought the UK had it wrong and Germany had it right, by 2000 when Germany had 5 million unemployed I'd switched my opinion.

    But now I hear the US is heading for an unemployment rate higher than Germany ever had (15% on CNN), and Germany unemployment is heading down, though it may temporarily rise. I reckon the UK unemployment will be bad as well, over 10%.

    It looks the tables have turned yet again.

    Who's right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    Agreed. However some people who are rabid anti-Thatcherites will disagree.

    So let's appease them.

    Let's pretend Maggie acquiesced to the Unions and gave them what they wanted.

    What would have happened ?

    Massive increase in taxes to pay for their parasitic demands as they continued to bleed the country dry.

    However, we keep nationalised industries going for another 10-15 years.

    Then, quite independently from the UK, the Taiwanese / Chinese Industrialization blossoms, the US and most of Europe off-shore their production, leaving GB with state-funded companies that are bankrupted by colossal labour costs selling expensive goods.

    In other words, Thatcher was damned if she did, and damned if she didn't.

    You want a culprit ?

    Globalisation.

    Who is responsible for globalisation ?

    We all are.
    Nationalised industries never work do they? Applause for smashing the manufacturing base. Nationalised car manufacturers ha, could never work, people would never buy the product, it couldn't last!

    Just looking out to the car park, >50% of the cars are French, can't run a train service either!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    DA would you agree that the unregulated free market is to blame for the mess we're now in? My take is that the Conservatives were successful in turning the country around, but that the mantra of monetarism and free market ideology over-rode common sense. That is always the case when a group of people think they have found the "truth" whether it's right or left-wingers.
    History tells us that reality in economics is always somewhere in between.
    I would also argue that in an age of globalism (which wasn't around when Thatcher was in power) the free market can work against the interests of a country. To what extent we are only just beginning to find out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Apologies PB, but I am afraid the word "hypocrite" stays
    Fair enough - not the first time I've been called that, doubt it'll be the last

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    As usual, you're resorting to mild abuse. I haven't called you any names, you're just a bloke with a different opinion. Unlike you, I can cope with people having a different opinion without needing to slag them as idiots, hypocrites etc. I know you'll never change your view of Thatcher, but is name-calling really likely to add much gravitas to your case?
    Apologies PB, but I am afraid the word "hypocrite" stays

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    you cheated by working abroad
    I left in May 1979 and now that I live in the old country again, I find a country fit for barrow-boys to live in, but still no work for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    If you like I will give you a list of companies that have been freed by Maggie from the yolk of Nationalisation/govt controlled markets. I will then argue that these companies have spent zillions on contractors in order to bring them in to the 20th century.

    You idiots like to make "unknowable assumptions" about the negative impacts of Thatcher 20 years later (pathetic and tenuous ones at that), so I would just like to point out what a bunch of little hypocrites you are.
    As usual, you're resorting to mild abuse. I haven't called you any names, you're just a bloke with a different opinion. Unlike you, I can cope with people having a different opinion without needing to slag them as idiots, hypocrites etc. I know you'll never change your view of Thatcher, but is name-calling really likely to add much gravitas to your case?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Except you make the arrogant and totally unknowable assumption that I'd be personally worse off if not for her. It doesn't matter how much you try to dress your opinion as fact
    If you like I will give you a list of companies that have been freed by Maggie from the yolk of Nationalisation/govt controlled markets. I will then argue that these companies have spent zillions on contractors in order to bring them in to the 20th century.

    You idiots like to make "unknowable assumptions" about the negative impacts of Thatcher 20 years later (pathetic and tenuous ones at that), so I would just like to point out what a bunch of little hypocrites you are.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Well if it is not mysoginy or middle class guilt that makes you overlook the fact that your personal wealth is entirely attributable to her reforms then what is it? you can chuck as many cliches about democracy in as you like but your hypocrisy still stinks
    Except you make the arrogant and totally unknowable assumption that I'd be personally (financially) worse off if not for her. It doesn't matter how much you try to dress your opinion as fact, it's just your opinion and I disagree with it.
    Last edited by Peoplesoft bloke; 26 November 2008, 10:11.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    Mine isn't.
    you cheated by working abroad

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Well if it is not mysoginy or middle class guilt that makes you overlook the fact that your personal wealth is entirely attributable to her reforms then what is it? you can chuck as many cliches about democracy in as you like but your hypocrisy still stinks
    Mine isn't.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X