• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Iceberg Sir, dead ahead!"

Collapse

  • stackpole
    replied
    So are we all agreed on the new paradigm? After all, if we are in debt to other countries, and they are all in debt to us, it all balances out. Where's the problem?

    Alistair, Westminster

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I love you really milan

    BUT The facts do not necessarily mean that there is a problem, perhaps you can explain why there is a problem.
    There is no problem. UK government simply needs to make more money to finance the very high debt levels. That's where you come in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Has our government thought of approaching Ocean Finance? The Houses of Parliament must be worth a few bob, Buck House, too. Sorted!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by stackpole View Post
    And how do those UK figures look historically in real terms?

    For all I know they could be better than they were in 1998, 1988 or 1978.

    We need perspective.
    Exactly. And politicians on both sides of the House, and journalists, play statistics games and rarely the truth will out.

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    How does this all-inclusive debt figure compare to other countries with those liabilities similarly included?
    And how do those UK figures look historically in real terms?

    For all I know they could be better than they were in 1998, 1988 or 1978.

    We need perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    DA,

    if there were a hat off smiley I would don my cap to your reply.

    Milan.
    You'd put your hat on?? Interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    I'll give you that one Winston

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    DA,

    if there were a hat off smiley I would don my cap to your reply.

    Milan.
    You would "Doff" your cap you illiterate ingrate!

    In fact, you should be stood there wringing your cap!

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    For us on the outside is is interesting, the UK reminds me of Houdini, manacled in a cage several hundred feet up hanging by a burning rope.

    It is truly an interesting spectacle to see "Houdini" get out of this one.
    But they've been sucker punched before the show this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    For us on the outside is is interesting, the UK reminds me of Houdini, manacled in a cage several hundred feet up hanging by a burning rope.

    It is truly an interesting spectacle to see "Houdini" get out of this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    DA,

    if there were a hat off smiley I would don my cap to your reply.

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Not at all. In fact it looks to me to be a whopper of a problem. But I never take anything at face value particularly when I can smell a potential agenda behind the presentation of an argument or facts.
    what does that smell like then? is it like all other foods that we can't describe "smells/tastes like chicken"

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    DA,

    'perhaps you can explain why there is a problem',

    me, explain something, you know that's an oxymoron.

    For you to have put the question, are you suggesting that such
    debt is not a problem ? Please explain why.

    Milan.

    Not at all. In fact it looks to me to be a whopper of a problem. But I never take anything at face value particularly when I can smell a potential agenda behind the presentation of an argument or facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • DiscoStu
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I love you really milan

    BUT The facts do not necessarily mean that there is a problem, perhaps you can explain why there is a problem.
    He's worried about the effect on prices for his potatoes

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    DA,

    'perhaps you can explain why there is a problem',

    me, explain something, you know that's an oxymoron.

    For you to have put the question, are you suggesting that such
    debt is not a problem ? Please explain why.

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X