• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Children in Need

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Children in Need"

Collapse

  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    The real children in need is / were those like Baby P. Not a single mention of that on air tonight it seems.
    Terry referred to it, but didn't explicitly refer by name. He said something like "the terrible news story that we've heard about this week", I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You don't make sense. A lot of money must have been spent on social workers, money doesn't prevent evil.
    I agree that money diesn't prevent evil - but not sure that money is spent on social workers. I have fought them - I am no fans of them - but its an easy budget to cut. the victims never complain - only publicity is in the worst cases.

    and social workers cannot be sued so they can do as they wish....

    not sure what I trying to say here - I wish I could think of a constructive way forward - like the rest of us....

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    There is already enough money in the pot for abused children. You can’t substitute commonsense with money. What is needed is commonsense and education for those who don’t have the former.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Children in Need is a safe way for celebs to keep their faces on the telly and show how "kind-hearted" they are, without looking desperate. If it wasn't all being done in the name of charity, it'd be known as The Crappest Show On Earth and wouldn't have made it to year 2.

    Leave a comment:


  • Badger
    replied
    Don't watch children in need since it was reported that Terry (Mr Insincerity) Wogan charged £10k to host the show. Interesting how he makes a point of asking if everyone has given up their time for free though (ok I watched Girls Aloud )

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    The real children in need is / were those like Baby P. Not a single mention of that on air tonight it seems.
    You don't make sense. A lot of money must have been spent on social workers, money doesn't prevent evil.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Finger fun

    When fast-forwarding through children in need, I noticed Jason Donovan making a phone-us signal with his hand. This involves extending the thumb and little finger and curling the remaining three digits of the hand, and placing this hand to the ear, as if making a phone call. Forget the part about putting your hand to your ear, what interests me is the curling of the three remaining fingers into the palm. I tried it, and the ring finger wasn't curled up as fully the the index and longest finger. Hmm. So I tried it with my left hand and this hand accomplishes the task most admirably. But I'm right handed, so might have expected the right hand to be more articulate than the left. Am I alone?

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    This cheap boring BBC CIN stuff serves only to make them and those washed out celebrities look good. It's also cheap TV so saves the Beeb some cash to waste on other purposes. I pay my license fee for decent informative programs, not this blinged up pseudo sincere nonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    The real children in need is / were those like Baby P. Not a single mention of that on air tonight it seems.
    Indeed events like this make me wonder why charities have to help these kids when it should be government. I want to help but I don't like this guilt trip which the government uses to avoid paying.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    The real children in need is / were those like Baby P. Not a single mention of that on air tonight it seems.

    History has proven that you get a better response when you make them laugh rather than depressed. Though this year I think the beeb has it the wrong way around. Not enough nakedness.

    Leave a comment:


  • moorfield
    replied
    This excuse for a BBC back slapping pre christmas knees up with its generous lashings of licence fee paid airtime for its wannabe B-list/newsreader-celebs is wearing thin.

    The real children in need is / were those like Baby P. Not a single mention of that on air tonight it seems.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Playing Company of Heroes - great visuals and excellent balance, well almost, my team wins

    Panzer General 1 and 2 were good

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by voodooflux View Post
    Blimey, I remember that - one of the games that came with my 800XL.

    It's a shame SSI are no longer around.


    So you're the scrote who nicked it!


    Did you find the ascii porn I had on one of the cassettes? Maybe that's where Fortune Green got it from. All your TPD belong to me!

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Used to play Eastern Front 1941 on the Atari when I was a teen. Been looking (though not very hard!) for something similar ever since. It was very easy to get into but still a thinking man's game. I'd try it using an emulator, but expect it's like all those hammer horrors, nothing like what you remember them.
    Blimey, I remember that - one of the games that came with my 800XL.

    It's a shame SSI are no longer around.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    All at the same time?

    Do you never just fancy a game of chess, or even tick tack toe!?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X