Originally posted by Moose423956
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Killing Likely.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Killing Likely."
Collapse
-
If only soldiers, sailors and air men/women got paid as much. They could justify it, whereas I'm certain you can't.Originally posted by Likely View PostRight , I charge 100 / hour please proceed with advance payment for all that time..
Leave a comment:
-
He should simply repeat what got him banned the last time, with a bit more fervour.
Maybe they'll block his IP address too
Leave a comment:
-
Post a picture of norks as your avatar. Then when they let you back, do it again. And again, until they ban you completely. HTH.Originally posted by Likely View PostI am accepting ideas about ways to kill Likely. Please suggest the most disgraceful statement you want me to say that is Likely to get Likely banned.
The most outrageous statement suggested I say will , and banned will be for good.
Leave a comment:
-
Word of day provides inspiration: We should immolate him.
Once we have done him, we can go after the Snot Goblin.
Leave a comment:
-
Suddenly, all his posts make a lot more sense. I wish I'd ignored him earlier.Originally posted by Diver View PostLikely -This user is on your Ignore List.
Leave a comment:
-
Put Likely and Contractor79 together.
But who would clean up the mess?
Leave a comment:
-
Not all, I am simply fussy character , come on sas , you don't hate me really ? I just have an opinion. That is all.Originally posted by sasguru View PostDo all people from ex-Soviet countries suffer from some sort of attention-seeking neuroticism and general cretinism? I mean look at atw, for another example....
Leave a comment:
-
Likely
This message is hidden because Likely is on your ignore list.
Leave a comment:
-
Do all people from ex-Soviet countries suffer from some sort of attention-seeking neuroticism and general cretinism? I mean look at atw, for another example....
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: