He's (nearly) back, He's (nearly) back, He's (not) on the right track

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

crimdon replied

22 August 2008, 11:50
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

Apologies if somebody mentioned it already (can't be @rsed to read all above) but what really worries me is how much it is going to cost us to protect him. The police will be obliged to do so.

Oh, I see Moose already did.

Just been on the radio that it costs about £1 million a year for police protection. There was one comment that the tabloids should pay this as its them who are whipping up the general public into a frenzy.
Leave a comment:
Fishface replied

22 August 2008, 11:03
Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post

There is a silver lining: have you considered how cheap tickets will be for his gigs?

dream machine
Leave a comment:
Bob Dalek replied

22 August 2008, 09:39
Originally posted by Xenophon View Post

Take a number and stand in line.

There is a silver lining: have you considered how cheap tickets will be for his gigs?
Leave a comment:
Xenophon replied

22 August 2008, 09:36
Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post

Makes me want to smash his ugly fizzog into a pulp.

Take a number and stand in line.
Leave a comment:
Moose423956 replied

22 August 2008, 09:33
Just look at the smiling ****. Makes me want to smash his ugly fizzog into a pulp.
Leave a comment:
Moose423956 replied

22 August 2008, 08:26
Originally posted by zeitghost

Let's burn him on a pile of ******s....

Wassat? Asterisks don't burn do they?
Leave a comment:
Moose423956 replied

22 August 2008, 08:21
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

Apologies if somebody mentioned it already (can't be @rsed to read all above) but what really worries me is how much it is going to cost us to protect him. The police will be obliged to do so.

Oh, I see Moose already did.

That's because I'm a miserable git.
Leave a comment:
The Lone Gunman replied

22 August 2008, 07:39
He's back!

He has already asked for 24 hour police protection.

This farce is going to run and run.
Leave a comment:
moorfield replied

21 August 2008, 20:02
He's coming home...
He's coming home...
He's coming...
Glitter's coming home...

etc. etc.

(IGMC )
Leave a comment:
xoggoth replied

21 August 2008, 19:19
Apologies if somebody mentioned it already (can't be @rsed to read all above) but what really worries me is how much it is going to cost us to protect him. The police will be obliged to do so.

Oh, I see Moose already did.
Leave a comment:
Peoplesoft bloke replied

21 August 2008, 16:15
I think the original Glitter Band fell out with him in the 70s - IIRC they had a sort of "solo" career as the Glitter Band.
Leave a comment:
KentPhilip replied

21 August 2008, 16:07
Vietnam - Thailand - Hong Kong - Thailand. Glitter's doing a world tour!

Get his band to accompany him airside and he could spend the next few months doing air-side gigs in every big airport in the world.

He could even sell tickets on Ebay. Using airside internet cafes of course
Leave a comment:
Bluebird replied

21 August 2008, 15:10
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post

So now law and order is to depend on a means test?

I thought it always did?
Leave a comment:
Peoplesoft bloke replied

21 August 2008, 15:01
Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post

And of course he'll end up being protected from the screaming hordes at taxpayers' expense, despite his own not insignificant fortune.

So now law and order is to depend on a means test?
Leave a comment:
Moose423956 replied

21 August 2008, 13:25
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post

Torch and Pitchfork sales are rocketing already.

And of course he'll end up being protected from the screaming hordes at taxpayers' expense, despite his own not insignificant fortune.
Leave a comment: