• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Man made global warming"

Collapse

  • King Cnvt
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Don't worry, Brown can hold back the tide, he's done it before and can do it again. At least I think I heard someone say he was a 'king knut.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    WHS.

    We have less than hours to live.
    Don't worry, Brown can hold back the tide, he's done it before and can do it again. At least I think I heard someone say he was a 'king knut.
    Last edited by TimberWolf; 19 August 2008, 12:03. Reason: CUK doesn't allow you to write c n u t

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    30 cm, 60m does it make any difference? The point is we need to switch to a sustainable green economy immediately or within 100 years we are all going to die.
    This can be done, and at the same time we can lift the 50% of people who earn less than the national average wage out of poverty.
    It's a no-brainer.
    WHS.

    We have less than hours to live.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post

    30 cm, 60m does it make any difference? The point is we need to switch to a sustainable green economy immediately or within 100 years we are all going to die.
    This can be done, and at the same time we can lift the 50% of people who earn less than the national average wage out of poverty.
    It's a no-brainer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    When you were diving, did you ever get out of your depth ?

    do you ever see fishies swimming around you with funny lights on their heads ?

    I'm out of my depth in everyday life

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    An shows less than 0.5m rise at a link off that page, for a projection for 2100. Time to start watching some proper science programmes (as if they exist)? http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/sl_proj_21st.html
    This is why I posted the link

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Ahhhh! This is bit more enlightening

    Clickety Click
    An shows less than 0.5m rise at a link off that page, for a projection for 2100. Time to start watching some proper science programmes (as if they exist)? http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/sl_proj_21st.html

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    When you were diving, did you ever get out of your depth ?

    do you ever see fishies swimming around you with funny lights on their heads ?





    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Ahhhh! This is bit more enlightening

    Clickety Click

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Up to 60m according to the scientists on "Earth Under Water"

    Sea levels have risen by 1/2 inch in the past eight years, loss of Ice/melting is doubling every year due to warming and attrition of Ice shelf & Glacier edge due to warmer seas.

    Can't be bothered to do the maths, work it out yourself.

    >Diver in Braindead & Bone-Idle mode<

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    sure it wasn't 6 m ?

    it was 20 feet in Imperial AGW flooding units.

    60m - blooming heck thats 6m a decade, if it started in 2000, as they claim ,we'd all be swimming by now
    According to A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise (2006):

    If this acceleration remained constant then the 1990 to 2100 rise would range from 280 to 340 mm, consistent with projections in the IPCC TAR.
    So 30 cm, or 0.3 metres.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Watched "Earth under water" on Nat Geo tonight.

    60M rise in sea levels by the end of the century if global warming and loss of glacial ice and polar ice continues to accelerate at present levels.

    Glad my house is well above the predicted new shoreline
    sure it wasn't 6 m ?

    it was 20 feet in Imperial AGW flooding units.

    60m - blooming heck thats 6m a decade, if it started in 2000, as they claim ,we'd all be swimming by now



    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    By the end of the century I'll be well past caring...

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Watched "Earth under water" on Nat Geo tonight.

    60M rise in sea levels by the end of the century if global warming and loss of glacial ice and polar ice continues to accelerate at present levels.
    Don't you mean 60 cm (which is still double the estimates I've seen).

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    global warming has been rebranded because of the Trade Descriptions Act; it's now called climate change

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X