• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Conservatives more content"

Collapse

  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    if you were driving in a remote area at night, no other car within five miles, and you came to a set of traffic lights on red. After a while they are still on red. Would you assume they were busted and drive through them ?





    Sure would! No really, I would (a) wait quite a long time, (b) not assume that they are busted, but deduce that they are probably busted. (c) drive through them.

    BTW the rules are you wait, if you don't want to wait any more you tuen round and go a different way.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by dinker View Post
    Lefties are usually thick ex art students, so don`t have any useful skills. They engage in gratuitous moral posturing to demonstrate virtue and so boost their self-esteem.
    WHS

    Stabbin's too good for 'em.

    Leave a comment:


  • dinker
    replied
    Lefties are usually thick ex art students, so don`t have any useful skills. They engage in gratuitous moral posturing to demonstrate virtue and so boost their self-esteem.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    That's pretty much right, if oversimplified.

    I believe that people should be left to run their own lives as much as possible, both because it is right and because they do it better than anybody else. But that is true in general, not in every case.

    I believe that there is such a thing as society, and it can be improved. But how best to do so, can not be known in advance.

    Therefore I believe in a system of piecemeal social change, responding to results, and learning as we go; while knowing the difference between applied testable methods, and real moral principles. I believe in as much liberty as possible, but that is not infinite. I believe in not making too many rules, but making (and changing) some. I believe in not preventing people from spending their own money (I didn't say "allowing", I said "not preventing"; it is not the govt's to "allow"), but I also believe that there is such a thing as a community, expressed by delegating community powers to govt, and funding it in common; and I believe that we have some duty to our fellow citizens, our fellow humans, and our posterity.

    So I don't easily classify as leftie or rightie liberal, but liberal I am: we used to call it social democrat. That didn't used to mean "indecisive wimp" and for me it still doesn't.
    if you were driving in a remote area at night, no other car within five miles, and you came to a set of traffic lights on red. After a while they are still on red. Would you assume they were busted and drive through them ?





    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    I am always worrying about the mess that the left-wingers make of the public services, their high taxes, high inflation, incompetence, corruption, lies, spin and theft of my Northern Rock shares.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    otoh if you're not a liberal when young, you've no heart, and if you're not a conservative when you're old, you've no head.

    I wonder how many of the successfully suicidal high-IQ types died before they made the switch?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    If you do a quick google it appears that people with higher a IQ are more prone to suicide and depression - does this mean conservaties have a lower or average IQ? :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Left-wingers are illiberal on economic issues but liberal on social issues, right-wingers generally the opposite.
    That's pretty much right, if oversimplified.

    I believe that people should be left to run their own lives as much as possible, both because it is right and because they do it better than anybody else. But that is true in general, not in every case.

    I believe that there is such a thing as society, and it can be improved. But how best to do so, can not be known in advance.

    Therefore I believe in a system of piecemeal social change, responding to results, and learning as we go; while knowing the difference between applied testable methods, and real moral principles. I believe in as much liberty as possible, but that is not infinite. I believe in not making too many rules, but making (and changing) some. I believe in not preventing people from spending their own money (I didn't say "allowing", I said "not preventing"; it is not the govt's to "allow"), but I also believe that there is such a thing as a community, expressed by delegating community powers to govt, and funding it in common; and I believe that we have some duty to our fellow citizens, our fellow humans, and our posterity.

    So I don't easily classify as leftie or rightie liberal, but liberal I am: we used to call it social democrat. That didn't used to mean "indecisive wimp" and for me it still doesn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    You wishy-washy bleeding heart liberal you.

    The reason more conservatively oriented people don't get upset, is because they view that people are largely responsible for their own actions. Borrow too much, you get repossessed. Whereas your average liberal wrings their hands over how awful it is that banks are allowed to lend money to people who won't be able to pay back.
    People are largely responsible for their own actions. If you think that pretty well all people are responsible for pretty well all that happens to them, then you either haven't seen much or haven't thought much.

    If you don't think that, but don't give a toss anyway, then I suppose you're a right-winger.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Left-wingers are illiberal on economic issues but liberal on social issues, right-wingers generally the opposite.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    You wishy-washy bleeding heart liberal you.

    The reason more conservatively oriented people don't get upset, is because they view that people are largely responsible for their own actions. Borrow too much, you get repossessed. Whereas your average liberal wrings their hands over how awful it is that banks are allowed to lend money to people who won't be able to pay back.
    And then insists on more legislation to prevent that, increase this, decrease the other, outlaw that mostly, blah, blah.

    This is the fundamental difference between the overbearing state-controlled, big brother, left wing, interferring, neo communist New Labour approach and a sensible freedoms oriented right wing approach to life.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    You meant the world's a tulipty place but right-wingers don't care? Not a recipe for contentment that I could live with.
    You wishy-washy bleeding heart liberal you.

    The reason more conservatively oriented people don't get upset, is because they view that people are largely responsible for their own actions. Borrow too much, you get repossessed. Whereas your average liberal wrings their hands over how awful it is that banks are allowed to lend money to people who won't be able to pay back.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Therefore pig ignorance must be ecstasy

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Ignorance is bliss

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Right-wingers happy, left-wingers miserable

    Apparently, it's because right-wingers don't get upset about social inequality, unlike left-wingers who are right whingers.
    You meant the world's a tulipty place but right-wingers don't care? Not a recipe for contentment that I could live with.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X