• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The great Randi and the £1,000,000 challenge"

Collapse

  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    A few reasons.

    1) As proposed by Jack Haldeman in his novel "Forever Peace"
    2) Trade-off between getting a Nobel prize and the end of the world.
    Go on then, tell me about the book...

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    Mini black holes? FFS! Why even risk it?
    A few reasons.

    1) As proposed by Jack Haldeman in his novel "Forever Peace"
    2) Trade-off between getting a Nobel prize and the end of the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post

    Mini black holes? FFS! Why even risk it?
    To paraphrase Zeity,
    I'm sure I went out with her in the 70's






    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Well some people put their money where their mouth is:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ngeenvironment
    Once the Hadron Collider project is up-and-running, all bets will be (literally) off, allegedly.

    Mini black holes? FFS! Why even risk it?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    The money has been placed in a sealed envelope in a sealed jar which will float around as the sea levels rise, straight to your door.
    Thanks to global warming the jar could take a short-cut through the Northwest Passage and straight to your doorstep in central London

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Well some people put their money where their mouth is:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ngeenvironment

    blooming heck sasman, many a true word spoken in jest and all that





    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    I like the idea of a climate futures market. I would be able to fleece money off the sceptic dimwits. Mind you they probably wouldn't bet as they're all full of hot air.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Well some people put their money where their mouth is:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ngeenvironment

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    started a topic The great Randi and the £1,000,000 challenge

    The great Randi and the £1,000,000 challenge

    The great Randi has announced a £1,000,000 prize to the go to the first AGW zealot who can explain why global warming is not causing any global warming. The money has been placed in a sealed envelope in a sealed jar which will float around as the sea levels rise, straight to your door.
    Randi is trying to debunk the claim that some AGM zealots can 'bend the truth' with just their minds. Supporters of 'truth bending' claim that they are only tiny truths, so they only require tiny minds.
    So far, AGM zealots have refused to take part in any controlled CUK experiment, they have confined their 'truth bending' to untestable assertions. Most of what they say is, in fact, unrepeatable.




Working...
X