• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK nuclear energy deal collapses"

Collapse

  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Oh great! Lets have the country held over a barrel. I remember the 3 day week - thank god maggie gave arfur the kicking he deserved.

    The country was in a great financial position until brown/blair came along.

    If only Maggie would stand for PM again...
    The three day week was during Tory rule by the way. You are right about not being held over a barrel and if your darling Mags hadn't done as she did maybe we wouldn't be being held over one by the French and Russians now. Arfur got the kicking he asked for - more fool him, but we didn't have to hand over everything to foreign spivs.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    its mad to hand strategic interests over to foreigners. EDF couldn't even manage to mark the SATs papers properly, would you trust johnny foreigner with our plutonium fissionables ?
    EDF have experience in operating them and I don't trust our profit and share holder driven and mostly incompetent UK companies on nuclear. EDF are mostly government owned and have a lot of experience in not blowing up France. I also don't have faith in our government's competence to assemble home-grown or foreign talent to research and develop new or innovative nuclear solutions. Hobsons choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    its mad to hand strategic interests over to foreigners. EDF couldn't even manage to mark the SATs papers properly, would you trust johnny foreigner with our plutonium fissionables ?





    I have seen "Johnny English" - I know what those Frenchies get up to...

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    its mad to hand strategic interests over to foreigners. EDF couldn't even manage to mark the SATs papers properly, would you trust johnny foreigner with our plutonium fissionables ?





    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Maybe we'd have had a few more options if Maggie hadn't closed all the coal mines and spent the north sea oil cash (including her windfall tax) on dole and QUANGOs. The only reason she never managed to sell off the nuclear industry was that there is no way to make a quick buck out of it so her spiv mates were not interested. Looks like that's still true.
    Oh great! Lets have the country held over a barrel. I remember the 3 day week - thank god maggie gave arfur the kicking he deserved.

    The country was in a great financial position until brown/blair came along.

    If only Maggie would stand for PM again...

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Maybe we'd have had a few more options if Maggie hadn't closed all the coal mines and spent the north sea oil cash (including her windfall tax) on dole and QUANGOs. The only reason she never managed to sell off the nuclear industry was that there is no way to make a quick buck out of it so her spiv mates were not interested. Looks like that's still true.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Not much choice since selling our Nuclear industry (Westinghouse? I forget) to Toshiba, calamitous state of science / engineering education & general crapulence of government.
    Yes, I tend to agree, sad though it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Hmm, I was hoping for work out of this as well. Back to the drawing board :-(

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    UK nuclear energy deal collapses. Do you think the French government should help us run our old and build our new nuclear reactors?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7536479.stm

    So they have a fair bit of experience in nuclear and the sale of our old reactors would help fill the chancellors coffers, but is it a good idea to let France do our nuclear for us? We can concentrate on being a nation of shop-keepers.
    Not much choice since selling our Nuclear industry (Westinghouse? I forget) to Toshiba, calamitous state of science / engineering education & general crapulence of government.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    started a poll UK nuclear energy deal collapses

    UK nuclear energy deal collapses

    12
    Yes, so I can to concentrate on being a shop-keeper
    16.67%
    2
    No, if anyone blows us up it should be us
    33.33%
    4
    AndyW already glows in the dark
    50.00%
    6
    UK nuclear energy deal collapses. Do you think the French government should help us run our old and build our new nuclear reactors?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7536479.stm

    A bit of background:
    We have 19 nuclear reactors many of which which will need decommission/replacing over the next decade. EDF, 85% owned by the French government, is interested in buying British energy and its 8 reactors. EDF also want to be 'a major actor in the nuclear rebirth in Britain'. But the deal has had a recent setback, see link. The French arguably lead the world in nuclear reactor use (but probably in old designs) and I believe also have access to a fair amount of nuclear fuel from former colonies. France has 58 nuclear reactors from which it generates most of its electricity (I forget the percentage, but its high) while we generate 19% through nuclear and import about 3% of France's mostly nuclear generated electricity. So they have a fair bit of experience in nuclear and the sale of our old reactors would help fill the chancellors coffers, but is it a good idea to let France do our nuclear for us? We can concentrate on being a nation of shop-keepers.
    Last edited by TimberWolf; 1 August 2008, 11:57.

Working...
X