• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government has good idea shock"

Collapse

  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post


    And anyway, won't the northern African countries need much of the energy for themselves? Their populations are increasing all the time.
    Er! I thought they were dying off in a massive Aids epidemic?

    Or is that media scaremongering again?

    Oh! North

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    So, the plan is to replace one energy source supplied from a group with a grudge and hostile intent against the west with another source supplied from an off-shoot of the same group with a grudge against the west.
    Agreed. It's not a technological problem so much as a geopolitical one.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigYinJames
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Mmmmmmmmmmm... pumped storage in a desert...
    Doesn't have to be liquid. They've developed pumped gas energy storage which is pretty efficient too.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    You don't even need that, just giant water tanks or reservoirs so some of the electricity produced during the day can be used to pump the water "uphill" and this can be released back down through turbines to generate eleccy at night.

    (Not sure how efficient that is though, or practical given the vast scale of a project like this if it's to power dozens of European cities.)
    Pretty respectable IIRC, though I forget the actual percentage. I've posted a link before to some Cambridge University professor's work that looked at energy sources in great and interesting detail and can post a link again if you're interested. The only downside to him is that he's heavily into CO2 emissions, which occupies a lot of his effort and work.

    The interesting thing about pumped storage is that payback can be significantly greater than 100%, when combined with tidal power. No doubt you can figure out why.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Batteries people, batteries. Capacitors, that kind of thing. It's not rocket science.
    You don't even need that, just giant water tanks or reservoirs so some of the electricity produced during the day can be used to pump the water "uphill" and this can be released back down through turbines to generate eleccy at night.

    (Not sure how efficient that is though, or practical given the vast scale of a project like this if it's to power dozens of European cities.)

    And anyway, won't the northern African countries need much of the energy for themselves? Their populations are increasing all the time.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, dozens of thorium reactors are the solution (for the foreseeable future), and the government better get started fast before all the experts die of old age! All this renewable energy stuff is just pissing about on the margins.

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View Post
    Giant mirrors floating in space isn't rocket science?
    Getting them up there might be!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigYinJames
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Batteries people, batteries. Capacitors, that kind of thing. It's not rocket science.
    Giant mirrors floating in space isn't rocket science?

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They do realise that the sun doesn't shine at night, when we need the lights?

    Or have I just pointed out a slight problem with this cunning plan?
    Batteries people, batteries. Capacitors, that kind of thing. It's not rocket science.

    Leave a comment:


  • Weltchy
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They do realise that the sun doesn't shine at night, when we need the lights?

    Or have I just pointed out a slight problem with this cunning plan?
    To cure this oversight, the anglo-french venture is proposing a massive solar mirror be built in space to reflect light from the sun onto the desert during night time, therefore creating 24 hours of sunlight.

    However, expect [INSERT FAVOURITE TERRORIST ORGANISATION HERE] to attempt a sabotage / takeover attempt, therefore threatening the world with a Dr Evil-esque "Laser Beam".

    Cue Jame Bond theme tune....

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They do realise that the sun doesn't shine at night, when we need the lights?

    Or have I just pointed out a slight problem with this cunning plan?
    But there is a 3-hour time zone difference though.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    So, the plan is to replace one energy source supplied from a group with a grudge and hostile intent against the west with another source supplied from an off-shoot of the same group with a grudge against the west. No doubt it will turn out that large solar arrays are just as much danger to people or the environment that burning oil.

    Sill, I suppose it’s better than encouraging or allowing the moving of vital parts of the operations of businesses out to foreign countries that are politically unstable, have a history of corruption and with weak recruitment processes that may hire people with a grudge; that simultaneously exposes businesses to potential interruption or fraud; and dismisses the indigenous workers thereby loosing knowledge and tax revenues. Thankfully, we don’t have a government that would do such a thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View Post
    One small problem, the Sahara is not British or French (unless they still own Algeria). Invasion time again?
    Nay-sayer. The Sarkozy trains comin' through & we need you to get on board.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Solar power from Sahara will keep Europe’s lights on

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4381687.ece

    European politicians are discussing ambitious plans to harvest the energy of the Saharan sun, connecting a vast network of solar panels to electricity grids across the continent. According to The Guardian, the project, estimated to cost up to £35.7 billion, is backed by Gordon Brown and President Sarkozy of France.

    Surely some mistake?
    have they included sales tax this time?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigYinJames
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Surely some mistake?
    One small problem, the Sahara is not British or French (unless they still own Algeria). Invasion time again?

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    started a topic Government has good idea shock

    Government has good idea shock

    Solar power from Sahara will keep Europe’s lights on

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4381687.ece

    European politicians are discussing ambitious plans to harvest the energy of the Saharan sun, connecting a vast network of solar panels to electricity grids across the continent. According to The Guardian, the project, estimated to cost up to £35.7 billion, is backed by Gordon Brown and President Sarkozy of France.

    Surely some mistake?

Working...
X