- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Preference: Easy ( stay low ) or personality/skills show off contract ?"
Collapse
-
I disagree but I am sure the HMRC will agree with you. However what if i am hired to put out fire ? What if the nature of the work is such that action is needed at certain times only ? Can my business be accused of trying to keep my client happy ? I.E by making sure my service is readily available ?Originally posted by Weltchy View PostHowever, from an IR35 point of view, the client would be paying you to sit around and do nothing, hence MOO = inside IR35 = bent over and shafted with NI, etc = less spondoolies.Last edited by Likely; 16 July 2008, 12:31.
Leave a comment:
-
However, from an IR35 point of view, the client would be paying you to sit around and do nothing, hence MOO = inside IR35 = bent over and shafted with NI, etc = less spondoolies.Originally posted by Likely View PostTechnically if you lay low , i.e don't do much you , then you make more money considering you get the same daily rate although you have actually worked 1 - 2 hours..
Leave a comment:
-
Technically if you lay low , i.e don't do much you , then you make more money considering you get the same daily rate although you have actually worked 1 - 2 hours..
Leave a comment:
-
I prefer to keep my head down, with the occasional bought of ostentatious brilliance near to renewal to remind them why they are paying me
Leave a comment:
-
It's just me voting. I like riding the fenceOriginally posted by kali View Postvery even split so far...
Leave a comment:
-
Just to be an annoying tit, I'm not sure the two options are realistic. Sometimes the 'keep your head down' contract is one where you are squirreled away doing a damn fine job. Those are thes I prefer, nobody bothers me until delivery date when I pull out the widget to much applause.
Sometimes the 'show off' contracts are the ones where you are in the public eye, firefighting major stuff and then sitting around with nothign to do the rest of the time. I hate those.
Leave a comment:
-
I prefer busy, time passes more quickly that way.Originally posted by Likely View PostBoth contracts paying your satisfactory rate.
Leave a comment:
-
Preference: Easy ( stay low ) or personality/skills show off contract ?
25I prefer the stay low contract.52.00%13I prefer the show off contract48.00%12Other:0.00%0Would you rather be in a contract where you don't have much to do thus you can utilize the time to your own advantage i.e to study something or research BTL. Or you rather be in a contract where you are 80 percent involved in the project AND doing what you like to be doing ?.
Both contracts paying your satisfactory rate.Last edited by Likely; 16 July 2008, 11:07.
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: