Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Remember to stay sharp
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Remember to stay sharp"
Collapse
-
In my case, I’ll be in long-term detention by the nuLieBore Stasi, awaiting execution for crimes that haven’t been specified.
-
It seems from Wikipedia that there was still activity in the transputer/occam scene around that time, although it's a bit light on dates.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWell universities always teach things that are out of date.
I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.
Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.
I always thought they had great potential - I might still have the datasheet for the original transputer somewhere
Leave a comment:
-
Well universities always teach things that are out of date.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThey were still using transputers in 1990?
I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.
I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.
Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.
Leave a comment:
-
They were still using transputers in 1990?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostDid that at university, what with Kent University being quite up on those new-fangled transputers that were going to revolutionise computing. In 1990.

I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.
Leave a comment:
-
I'll be ok for now - by the time they put 1000+ cores in an iSeries, I think I'll be in stasis, waiting for a long term cure for a disease that hasn't been discovered yet...Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Remember to stay sharp
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58


Leave a comment: