Originally posted by Moscow Mule
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Remember to stay sharp
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Remember to stay sharp"
Collapse
-
In my case, I’ll be in long-term detention by the nuLieBore Stasi, awaiting execution for crimes that haven’t been specified.
-
It seems from Wikipedia that there was still activity in the transputer/occam scene around that time, although it's a bit light on dates.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWell universities always teach things that are out of date.
I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.
Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.
I always thought they had great potential - I might still have the datasheet for the original transputer somewhere
Leave a comment:
-
Well universities always teach things that are out of date.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThey were still using transputers in 1990?
I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.
I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.
Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.
Leave a comment:
-
They were still using transputers in 1990?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostDid that at university, what with Kent University being quite up on those new-fangled transputers that were going to revolutionise computing. In 1990.

I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.
Leave a comment:
-
I'll be ok for now - by the time they put 1000+ cores in an iSeries, I think I'll be in stasis, waiting for a long term cure for a disease that hasn't been discovered yet...Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Remember to stay sharp
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42


Leave a comment: