• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Remember to stay sharp"

Collapse

  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I'll be ok for now - by the time they put 1000+ cores in an iSeries, I think I'll be in stasis, waiting for a long term cure for a disease that hasn't been discovered yet...
    In my case, I’ll be in long-term detention by the nuLieBore Stasi, awaiting execution for crimes that haven’t been specified.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Well universities always teach things that are out of date.

    I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.

    Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.
    It seems from Wikipedia that there was still activity in the transputer/occam scene around that time, although it's a bit light on dates.

    I always thought they had great potential - I might still have the datasheet for the original transputer somewhere

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    They were still using transputers in 1990?

    I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.
    Well universities always teach things that are out of date.

    I forget. Maybe it was post-transputer, but they were still all talking about parallel computing as the next big thing. I did think Occam's way of grouping PAR and SEQ bits of code was really neat and based something else I did years later on that.

    Hopefully there'll be a big surge of companies wanting their old C++ apps rewritten to take advantage of the now common place multi core processors, and those of us with the relevant experience can clean up. Boomed! Haven't seen much evidence yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Did that at university, what with Kent University being quite up on those new-fangled transputers that were going to revolutionise computing. In 1990.
    They were still using transputers in 1990?

    I remember them being launched in 1984... I thought they were pretty much dead in the water by 1990.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Which processor assumes overall control?
    It don't work like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Time to brush up my occam skills
    Did that at university, what with Kent University being quite up on those new-fangled transputers that were going to revolutionise computing. In 1990.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Which processor assumes overall control?

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Time to brush up my occam skills

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    .NET can cope with anything.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
    This sounds some of us might need to keep educating ourselves

    new way of programming
    I'll be ok for now - by the time they put 1000+ cores in an iSeries, I think I'll be in stasis, waiting for a long term cure for a disease that hasn't been discovered yet...

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    started a topic Remember to stay sharp

    Remember to stay sharp

    This sounds some of us might need to keep educating ourselves

    new way of programming

Working...
X