• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Top Secret Terror Files Left On Train"

Collapse

  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    "Canada, USA, Britain and Australian Eyes only"

    There you go. If you need a translation into "Moron" see Bagpuss!
    Actually fella, that's what's known as a caveat and that particular one you're referring to is foureyes. That's just a little bit different to what a classification is. But hey, bullsh1t baffles brains doesn't it.

    And far be it from me to point out inconsistencies, but the document was actually classified 'Secret', not 'Top Secret' again a little irregularity, but who are we to care.

    And it was a JIC (Joint Intelligence Committee) produced report, not NSA. There won't have been a single scrap of anything interesting in it because GCHQ and the agencies don't like telling the JIC anything. It goes through far too many hands for it to be considered a secure environment, as the good civil servant at the cabinet office demonstrated.

    I can’t wait for someone at the BBC to be prosecuted. The OSA is quite strict in that it also covers journalists or any member of the public who obtains protected information which has been disclosed without authority. Even if the information reaches the person indirectly (after passing through the hands of several people, or by being read in the newspapers) it could still be an offence to pass it on. The BBC knew full well what they’d received. I wonder how many of those grubby little commies got their kicks out of cackling over that report.

    Oh and welcome me to the forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    I wouldn't listen to what the dog says - he still lags on trees ffs!!
    I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire mate.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    MFI might be pushing things!
    I wouldn't listen to what the dog says - he still lags on trees ffs!!

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Have you ever thought of joining MI6 or MI5? You'd should fit right in, they're a bunch of fuqtards too!
    MFI might be pushing things!

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I hate that AVON lady. She leaves those pamplets everytime - I've told her we don't want any.
    By crikey, you just might be on to something. They travel under the cover of darkness delivering their evil pamphlets and leaflets! All the while we thought it was Al Quaeeda!!! It's the bloody Avon you should be watching out for!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    Whoever is responsible should be locked up in the tower for a lot longer than 42 days.

    Moose
    So that is the big brother watching sun reading prols. I hope they can expand the tower a bit...

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    If there's a knock on your door tonight, don't answer...
    I hate that AVON lady. She leaves those pamplets everytime - I've told her we don't want any.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Wife had the car. But I could have always hijacked a bus.
    If there's a knock on your door tonight, don't answer...

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    It stopped you going out and killing someone with that nasty polluting smelly motorcar though, didn't it?
    Wife had the car. But I could have always hijacked a bus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    I haven't seen a news report on this since it broke last night so don't know the specifics. And I've still never seen the term 'classification of clearance' as they're two separate, but related, things. Jockey!

    Go outside and take your head for a dump you scabby dog...
    Have you ever thought of joining MI6 or MI5? You'd should fit right in, they're a bunch of fuqtards too!

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    I was talking about that specific document!

    FFS, and you care, obviously. Mr "I've been involved with this stuff for years" Bollocks!
    I haven't seen a news report on this since it broke last night so don't know the specifics. And I've still never seen the term 'classification of clearance' as they're two separate, but related, things. Jockey!

    Go outside and take your head for a dump you scabby dog...

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    Well yes, you could be found guilty of having information that might be useful to a terrorist. Just like the poor sap who printed the so called 'Al-Queada Manual' that was on the University Reading list for a student in Nottingham. Banged up for 6 days and then re-arrested for visa violations and they tried to put him on a plane before his appeal was due to be heard. The courts prevented that happening.
    Surely our Security Services don't do things like that...

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    So if, say, the person that has the documents then scans them to a PDF and puts them in the public domain...and I download it to have a look. Am I guilty of something?
    Well yes, you could be found guilty of having information that might be useful to a terrorist. Just like the poor sap who printed the so called 'Al-Queada Manual' that was on the University Reading list for a student in Nottingham. Banged up for 6 days and then re-arrested for visa violations and they tried to put him on a plane before his appeal was due to be heard. The courts prevented that happening.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Examples? 'coz I didn't see any yesterday. Except for watching the debate
    on the amendments to the prevention of terrorism bill/act. Some pretty complelling arguments against. Some pretty weak ones for.
    It stopped you going out and killing someone with that nasty polluting smelly motorcar though, didn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Nope, but you might just do that one day...

    Best to stay at home, eh?

    There's lots of nice telly to stop you thinking too hard...
    Examples? 'coz I didn't see any yesterday. Except for watching the debate
    on the amendments to the prevention of terrorism bill/act. Some pretty complelling arguments against. Some pretty weak ones for.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X