• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Brown to blame for Britain's economic woes - official"

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Once again: He got the Blair seal of approval. That is about as official as it gets.
    Blair now holds no office within the UK government. Ergo, what he says now cannot be described as "official" in any matter relating to the government of the UK.

    (Do they not teach English or logic any more )

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    But Blair was PM when Brown was chancellor, so has overall responsibility. So if he was to blame Brown, he would be proxy be blaming himself. Captain of the ship and all that.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    .... and call it "official". What does "official" mean to you, young fellow? Or I a grumpy old git for thinking that words have meanings?
    Once again: He got the Blair seal of approval. That is about as official as it gets.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Just curious: how do you get from the headline "Blair says Brown 'not to blame'" to the title "Brown to blame"?
    .... and call it "official". What does "official" mean to you, young fellow? Or I a grumpy old git for thinking that words have meanings?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Given that he was responding to a question in a TV interview, he could have made things much more difficult for Brown by evading the question - but he didn't, which casts doubt on your belief that this was his intention.
    true true - but if I tell you not to think of a blue monkey - what is the first thing that comes to mind?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Just curious: how do you get from the headline "Blair says Brown 'not to blame'" to the title "Brown to blame"?
    When Bliar opens his mouth to confirm or deny something you can safely assume the oposite is true. How many time has he given his full support to someone who has subsequently been sacked. They spin the story but everybody knows the truth.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Given that he was responding to a question in a TV interview, he could have made things much more difficult for Brown by evading the question - but he didn't, which casts doubt on your belief that this was his intention.
    Whatever Blair intended, on the charge that he hasn't put money aside for a rainy day, he is guilty as charged.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    By Blair saying Brown NOT to blame he:

    1. Makes people think about whether Brown is to blame or not and highlights the possibility.
    Given that he was responding to a question in a TV interview, he could have made things much more difficult for Brown by evading the question - but he didn't, which casts doubt on your belief that this was his intention.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Just curious: how do you get from the headline "Blair says Brown 'not to blame'" to the title "Brown to blame"?
    By Blair saying Brown NOT to blame he:

    1. Makes people think about whether Brown is to blame or not and highlights the possibility.

    2. By virtue that everything that comes out of that teflon coated grinning gob is a lie, it is obvious to many that he is saying Brown is to blame.

    3. If Gordon made claim to the boom, he is by definition the root cause of the bust.

    4. Stabbity stab stab

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    coz B'Liar said it

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Just curious: how do you get from the headline "Blair says Brown 'not to blame'" to the title "Brown to blame"?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Blair stabbin Brown in the back, how unusual.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brown to blame for Britain's economic woes - official

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7433781.stm

Working...
X