• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Failed to get SC Security Clearance"

Collapse

  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I think we have discovered recursion.

    Stack overflow at line 0.

    It's a slow day!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    Asking whether confirmation of the question "is mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA" is a violation of the OSA is a violation of the OSA
    I think we have discovered recursion.

    Stack overflow at line 0.

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Is confirming that "mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA" is in fact a violation of the OSA?
    Asking whether confirmation of the question "is mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA" is a violation of the OSA is a violation of the OSA

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Yes. Next.

    Is confirming that "mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA" is in fact a violation of the OSA?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Is mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA?
    Yes. Next.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Even mentioning that the form is covered by the OSA is a violation of the OSA.

    Is mentioning that mentioning the form is covered by the OSA a violation of the OSA?

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    dont encourage me
    The spring sunshine does not warm so well as a summer's day.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    The first rule of Fight Club is - you do not talk about Fight Club.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Even mentioning that the form is covered by the OSA is a violation of the OSA.

    Exactly!

    Oooops!

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    The sun is shining on red square as the wind blows from the east.
    dont encourage me






    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    shhh
    I read the post five minutes ago, I think I am being followed.
    I'll go to the loo, climb out the window and go down a manhole, come up in the carpark and come back in through reception. See if they are still on my tail.
    From now on I will use the phrase 'Wound my heart with a monotonous langur' just so you know its really me




    The sun is shining on red square as the wind blows from the east.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Everything about that form is covered by the OSA.
    Even mentioning that the form is covered by the OSA is a violation of the OSA.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Why? Does the fact you've failed SC become secret as soon as it happens?
    shhh
    I read the post five minutes ago, I think I am being followed.
    I'll go to the loo, climb out the window and go down a manhole, come up in the carpark and come back in through reception. See if they are still on my tail.
    From now on I will use the phrase 'Wound my heart with a monotonous langur' just so you know its really me




    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Why? Does the fact you've failed SC become secret as soon as it happens?
    Everything about that form is covered by the OSA.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Firstly, you signed the official secrets act as part of completing the form so you've just commited a "no no"!
    Why? Does the fact you've failed SC become secret as soon as it happens?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X