• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh Dear: First-time buyers on poverty 'knife-edge'"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    "We"
    So which money tree do you think the money will come from? Gordon Brown's or the bank's?

    Leave a comment:


  • sappatz
    replied
    ownership

    Yes, tulip happens, life's not fair etc etc by why bleat to the state all the time?
    the state gives the wrong signals, it encourages evryone to become a property owner, among others with low-interest loans and tax cuts. Ownership is obviosuly not for evryone and the pros and cons should be seriously weighed.

    This is for political reasons, owners are less prone to cause trouble or disruption in general.

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Yes, to protect the rest of us. We are paying for those bad debts.
    "We"

    Leave a comment:


  • ALM
    replied
    The impression you get from people nowadays is that they are desperate to own property as either "a right" or a belief that they will make money on the "guaranteed" equity. When unexpected things happen that they haven't insured/planned against, they immediately expect their employer or state to support them. The option of selling and renting doesn't even come into it. Financial planning... should be taught in schools. Yes, tulip happens, life's not fair etc etc by why bleat to the state all the time?
    Totally agree with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
    Of course they are, they just pass on those bad debts to the customer by raising charges. If the loss came off their profit margin, or directly out of share holders pockets then they would be much less willing to lend money to just anyone.
    Absolutely. Don't think for one moment the banks are doing it out of the kindness of their hearts (or bottom line).

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucifer Box
    Indeed, this falls under the long-standing irresponsible lending legislation and the banks pay the price by having the courts annul the debts. The blame for that falls on the banks but it is a price they are prepared to pay (seemingly)
    Of course they are, they just pass on those bad debts to the customer by raising charges. If the loss came off their profit margin, or directly out of share holders pockets then they would be much less willing to lend money to just anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by Rebecca Loos
    There should be much more stringent checks applied by lenders on who they lend to and how much.
    Indeed, this falls under the long-standing irresponsible lending legislation and the banks pay the price by having the courts annul the debts. The blame for that falls on the banks but it is a price they are prepared to pay (seemingly)

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Rebecca Loos
    There should be much more stringent checks applied by lenders on who they lend to and how much.
    Yes, to protect the rest of us. We are paying for those bad debts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebecca Loos
    replied
    Mmmmhh.... I'm in two minds about those kind of stories. Yes people are irresponsible to apply and lie to get those loans, but on the other hands, it serves the irresponsible lenders right when people can't pay back. There should be much more stringent checks applied by lenders on who they lend to and how much.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Did you see the BBC1 program last night on unsecured loans given by high street banks?

    In summary, people owe thousands of pounds on unsecured loans (which, due to small print, are actually secured on property and you pay a higher APR) and go bleating to Fiona Bruce saying it's the banks fault.

    Well, the banks are not doing the basic financial checks as they seem to be pushing the insurance that goes with it.

    However, as soon as the BBC get involved, all the banks cancel the debt - with one irresponsible couple who were adamant it wasn't their fault despite applying for £100,000 worth of loans, had their debt cleared in one go.

    So now we have people irresponsibly applying for loans that they know they cannot afford, bank OK with it as long as they can push the insurance, piss it up on a holiday or car, claim they were spoofed by the bank/depression/can't read or write and the bank tells them not to pay it back.

    What kind of message is this? I mean one couple lied about their salary FFS and still were adamant it wasn't their fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD
    life's not fair etc etc by why bleat to the state all the time?
    Unfortunately, that is the inevitable consequence of this government's social policies, which are breeding a generation of people dependent on the state for virtually all of their needs. There are children growing up who know no other life beyond handouts from the state. This is hugely dangerous and will take a lot longer to correct than to institute.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    There was no help from the state
    be better off had they not bought their homes and lived on benefits
    to get the level of benefits that will enable us to survive.
    and my employer did not provide any help with moving costs.
    and was gutted at the lack of help I received after years of paying my taxes
    it's the one illness your insurance doesn't cover
    we'd be better off if we lived in council accommodation and on benefits
    the benefits department suggested I sell up and rent instead!
    Owning a house requires serious financial planning, including ensuring you are covered with the relevant insurances. If you can't afford them then you must take the risks.

    When my father ran into difficulties, he sold the house and we rented. Yes it was a distruption to our lives but we carried on regardless. Then many years later when my father had saved enough money, he managed to buy again.

    The impression you get from people nowadays is that they are desperate to own property as either "a right" or a belief that they will make money on the "guaranteed" equity. When unexpected things happen that they haven't insured/planned against, they immediately expect their employer or state to support them. The option of selling and renting doesn't even come into it. Financial planning... should be taught in schools. Yes, tulip happens, life's not fair etc etc by why bleat to the state all the time?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Hello

    Originally posted by xoggoth
    Yeh gods! Property price threads! Sooner have CL's interminable religion threads anyday. Hey, I done jus seen what purgatory like! Sho nuff.
    Hello Xog, how are you? you old w***er

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth
    Yeh gods! Property price threads! Sooner have CL's interminable religion threads anyday. Hey, I done jus seen what purgatory like! Sho nuff.
    Praise de Lawd, massa.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Yeh gods! Property price threads! Sooner have CL's interminable religion threads anyday. Hey, I done jus seen what purgatory like! Sho nuff.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X