• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "oh dear: Teachers say no-one should 'fail'"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by hattra
    U was "try again next year". Is it still the same these days?
    ISTR that U stood for Unclassified, the equivalent to not turning up, or doing so badly you might as well not have.

    In which case, rather than "try again next year", it was more like "try going to school first".

    Leave a comment:


  • hattra
    replied
    IIRC "A" levels grades A - E were a pass, F was a marginal fail, so you could do an early resit (I seem to remember that they were done during the Summer holidays), O was an "O" level pass, and U was "try again next year". Is it still the same these days?

    It looks as if the "O" level grades may have started to change from numeric in the early 70's (at least for some exam boards) - I didn't think that happened until just before the GCSEs were brought in - you live and learn, eh!

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    A levels were graded A to F, O, and U.
    What was O?

    I seem to recall you could fail an A level, but just do well enough to get an O level. Is that what it was?

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    I didn't do very well in my O-level mocks, which shocked me a bit, and it was the fear of failure in the real exams that got me in off the streets at night and brought to an end my budding career as a yob.

    I wouldn't have had the same fear of deferred success.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by wibs
    Ten O levels here and every single one of them graded with a letter.
    Originally posted by hattra
    Mine were done in 1971/1972 - all GCE's and numeric grades.
    My GCEs were done in the seventies, most were letters but some were numeric, due to different examining boards. I did one CSE in woodwork, and that was numeric too.

    Lettered GCEs were passes from A to E, F was a failure and U was Unclassified.

    Numeric GCEs were passes from 1 to 6 (I think). I don't know how they classified failures.

    Leave a comment:


  • hattra
    replied
    Mine were done in 1971/1972 - all GCE's and numeric grades - Oxford and Cambridge board (now part of OCR, I think), apart from Physics, which was Nuffield. CSE's were numeric, and "A" levels were alphabetic. Could be dependant on the exam board, but everybody I've ever spoken to from that period had numeric grades. Mind you, I can't even remember what most of my grades were, as they didn't print them on the certificate - we got separate notification, which I lost years ago. I remember got grade 1 in Physics and Grade 6 in Latin, but the rst is a bit of a blur.

    Leave a comment:


  • wibs
    replied
    Originally posted by hattra
    Lonio,

    If you got graded A-F, etc, then you did GCSEs, not GCE "O" levels
    Ten O levels here and every single one of them graded with a letter. Mine are definitely not GCSEs. CSEs gave numeric grades, but not GCEs, unless they changed the grades in the latter years of the GCE.

    A-C were passes, anything after that just told you how badly you failed.

    Leave a comment:


  • hattra
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
    Who do they think they are kidding?

    I seem to remember my O levels where no one could fail.
    Grade were A,B,C,D,E,F and U (unclassified).
    I got 10 O levels. I only ever mention the ones grade C and above as everyone (including me) sees the rest as failures.

    All they will succeed in doing is to force employers and Unis to ask different question, no longer how many GCSEs, but How many GCSE A*s did you get.
    Lonio,

    If you got graded A-F, etc, then you did GCSEs, not GCE "O" levels - they were graded 1-6 (pass), 7 (marginal fail - eligible for a resit in the Summer hols), 8 & 9 (bog off and don't waste my time) - pass mark was 40% for a grade 6. Apparently a Grade 6 "O" level is equivalent to a low-end Grade "C" at GCSE, and the lower GCSE grades are equivalent to the old CSE grades 1 to 6.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Maybe it ain't so important really. It fits in with the society they will live in. Since we have abandoned the natural law, viz failure=starvation, and ultimately doomed the human race in so doing, we might just as well massage the egos of the worthless. Next to filling their faces, it is pretty cheap.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Without someone else failing, your success means nothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise
    In a decent education system no one should fail
    In a decent education system with sufficiently frequent use of the cane no one should fail!

    OwlHoot in "knowledge that is not willingly sought must needs with the rod be taught!" mode

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    [b]Liz Beattie, a retired teacher, will call on the association's annual gathering in Buxton, Derbyshire, to "delete the word 'fail' from the educational vocabulary to be replaced with the concept of 'deferred success'"
    I wonder when she retired - at 65 as a silver-haired old school marm with 40 years experience or a year or two after giving front line teaching a go, failing, and then retreating back into the ivory tower of "education studies". My money's on the second.


    OwlHoot in "education theorists - I've tulip 'em" mode

    Leave a comment:


  • WageSlave
    replied
    Bagpuss, we will end up like Alabama.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    In my day...is too good for em... socialist scum... if I had my way... back on the first boat...better in my day... once great nation....whats the world comming to...worked hard for what I have....never had it so easy...they don't bloody care...falling stardards..where will it all end

    Leave a comment:


  • WageSlave
    replied
    Originally posted by John Galt
    Please accept my sincere apologies WS I now feel totally inadequate and a complete failure for not noticing - tieing the knot in the noose now
    John, you're forgiven

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X